2013
DOI: 10.1016/s1873-9946(13)60237-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P215 Endoscopic remission (Mayo score 0 rather than score 1) predicts long-term clinical remission in ulcerative colitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the literature, a subscore of 0 or 1 should be considered as endoscopic remission ( 130 ) (CEBM 1a). Experts agreed that a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 is the optimal target, although there is insuffi cient information to recommend this target for all patients, and a subscore of 1 should be a minimum target ( 144,145 ). In the Active Ulcerative Colitis Trials-1 and -2 of infl iximab in patients with moderate-to-severe UC, 25% of patients had achieved a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 by week 8, with 61% achieving a score of 0 or 1 ( 50 ).…”
Section: Endoscopic Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the literature, a subscore of 0 or 1 should be considered as endoscopic remission ( 130 ) (CEBM 1a). Experts agreed that a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 is the optimal target, although there is insuffi cient information to recommend this target for all patients, and a subscore of 1 should be a minimum target ( 144,145 ). In the Active Ulcerative Colitis Trials-1 and -2 of infl iximab in patients with moderate-to-severe UC, 25% of patients had achieved a Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 by week 8, with 61% achieving a score of 0 or 1 ( 50 ).…”
Section: Endoscopic Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, despite making the stated goals of treatment to include an endoscopic assessment, the committee noted that there was a lack of direct evidence linking the achievement of endoscopic targets in UC to improved outcomes, with most of the evidence coming from epidemiologic studies or being inferred from clinical trial data with heterogeneous end points. 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 Since then, mounting evidence points to the superior predictive ability of the UCEIS scoring system compared with the Mayo endoscopic subscore. In addition, several barriers to the adoption of a treat-to-target strategy continue to limit its widespread adoption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%