2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2008.05.1738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P3‐172: Comparison of fruit vs. animal verbal fluency in the screening for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants were initially assessed for cognitive impairment using the Brazilian version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [14,15], Clock Drawing Task (CDT) [16,17], Verbal FluencyAnimals [18], Verbal Fluency-Fruits [19,20] and the Clinical Dementia Rate (CDR) [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants were initially assessed for cognitive impairment using the Brazilian version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [14,15], Clock Drawing Task (CDT) [16,17], Verbal FluencyAnimals [18], Verbal Fluency-Fruits [19,20] and the Clinical Dementia Rate (CDR) [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fruit category has been found to generate smaller performance gaps among groups with differing levels of education (Reis et al, 2003). Studies conducted with Brazilian older adults have suggested that animal and fruit category fluency tasks generate similar results and both categories seem appropriate to detect cognitive decline (Radanovic et al, 2008). Brazilian norms suggest that healthy seniors with 8 years of education or less generate in average 13 items, and seniors with more than 8 years generate in average 16 items (Brucki & Rocha, 2004).…”
Section: Cognitive Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%