2011
DOI: 10.4086/toc.gs.2011.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aaronson's theorem, post-BQP=PP [30], is quite useful to obtain not only quantum complexity results combined with the postselection argument by Bremner et al [38], but also to provide 'quantum proofs' of classical complexity results [39]. For example, in [30], Aaronson provided alternative and much simpler proof (corresponding to single-qubit rotations).…”
Section: Strong Simulation and Post-bqp=pp Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aaronson's theorem, post-BQP=PP [30], is quite useful to obtain not only quantum complexity results combined with the postselection argument by Bremner et al [38], but also to provide 'quantum proofs' of classical complexity results [39]. For example, in [30], Aaronson provided alternative and much simpler proof (corresponding to single-qubit rotations).…”
Section: Strong Simulation and Post-bqp=pp Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be viewed as a 'quantum proof' of #P-hardness of approximating the imaginary Ising partition functions. Aaronson's post-BQP=PP theorem [30], which is employed to show the above result, is also utilized to provide a 'quantum proof' [39] of #P-hardness of approximating the permanent [17] and the Jones polynomial [40] with a multiplicative error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a final note, it would be fascinating to show if the analysis of computation in generalized probabilistic theories could say something concrete about quantum computing. In an analogous fashion, tools from quantum theory have been used to prove results in classical computer science; see [59] for a nice review of such results. We speculate that by understanding quantum theory better within the framework of more general theories we can use tools from the latter to prove results in the former.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closure of the classical complexity class PP under intersection was first shown using classical techniques by Beigel, Reingold, and Spielman [BRS95], but Aaronson showed it could be reproven using quantum techniques in a simpler way [Aar05]. The survey by Drucker and de Wolf provides more examples of this proof technique [DW11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%