1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1415-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pacing and Outcomes: Economic Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were variations in the types of costs considered in each, and this partly accounts for the divergent conclusions shown. Two studies 95,96 concluded that overall costs for dual-chamber were greater than single-chamber pacing and two 97,98 reached the opposite conclusion.…”
Section: Progression To Avbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were variations in the types of costs considered in each, and this partly accounts for the divergent conclusions shown. Two studies 95,96 concluded that overall costs for dual-chamber were greater than single-chamber pacing and two 97,98 reached the opposite conclusion.…”
Section: Progression To Avbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other costs are derived from national averages provided by numerous health care organizations and the government. [56][57][58][59] Comparison of costs can be found in Table 2. Cost savings are calculated using an estimated cost for each health outcome and multiplying it by the effect size for that particular health outcome.…”
Section: Economic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that costs from any system can be utilized and the probability of occurrence is multiplied by the desired cost basis. 59 An example for DRG 108, used to calculate costs for reoperation is as follows. The charged amount for DRG 108 is multiplied by 80% to reflect estimated costs:…”
Section: Economic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Economic considerations related to dual-chamber pacing have recently been evaluated. 3,13 One investigator 3 has shown that in the long run, there is a significant cost benefit to implanting DDD pacemakers in patients with preserved sinus rhythm. In addition, meta-analysis of existing retrospective studies has also demonstrated a significant incremental cost associated with single-chamber ventricular pacing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, meta-analysis of existing retrospective studies has also demonstrated a significant incremental cost associated with single-chamber ventricular pacing. 13 Critical appraisal of the current data (multiple large outcomes studies and small prospective randomized studies) leads us to believe that there is strong evidence to suggest that atrial-based pacing is superior to ventricular pacing in terms of hemodynamic and electrophysiological profiles, morbidity, and mortality, and consequently in long-term cost benefit as well as patient preference. There are limited subsets of patients for whom ventricular pacing is the mode of choice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%