2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PAD1 and FDC1 are essential for the decarboxylation of phenylacrylic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
148
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
148
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The decarboxylation ability was only observed in strains that exhibited high transcription levels of both PAD1 and FDC1. This result might suggest that both functional PAD1 and FDC1 are required in this process, which is consistent with previous research (6). Normal transcription of PAD1 was observed in both ferulic acid decarboxylation-active and -inactive strains, indicating that PAD1p was not the direct functional enzyme.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decarboxylation ability was only observed in strains that exhibited high transcription levels of both PAD1 and FDC1. This result might suggest that both functional PAD1 and FDC1 are required in this process, which is consistent with previous research (6). Normal transcription of PAD1 was observed in both ferulic acid decarboxylation-active and -inactive strains, indicating that PAD1p was not the direct functional enzyme.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In 1990, Meaden and Taylor (14) cloned a functional gene which endowed yeasts with the ability to decarboxylate phenolic acid. Mukai et al (6) confirmed that both PAD1 and FDC1 are essential for the decarboxylation of ferulic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Clausen et al (15) reported that PAD1 contributes to cinnamic acid decarboxylation in S. cerevisiae and the introduction of PAD1 into mutants that lacked PADp activity allowed the recovery of this biological activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1. The observation that the ylr290c⌬ mutant still produces small amounts of Q 6 is not fully consistent with this hypothesis; however, there may be redundant decarboxylases capable of bypassing the ylr290c⌬ mutant such as Pad1 and Fdc1, two phenylacrylic acid decarboxylases with homology to the E. coli Q biosynthetic decarboxylases UbiD and UbiX (70,71). Expression of yeast PAD1 in an E. coli ubiX mutant restored Q 8 synthesis; however, yeast mutants lacking either PAD1, FDC1, or both produce wild-type levels of Q 6 (71,72), potentially because of their functions as redundant decarboxylases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We do not know whether EPH1 arrived in the wine strains directly from S. paradoxus or from a separate horizontal transfer event. The third S. paradoxus introgression event is only seen in the Brazilian fuel yeast BG1 and encompasses a region of ;4 kb containing the STL1 gene (involved in glycerol transport) (Tulha et al 2010) and the PAD1 and FDC1 genes (both phenolic acid decarboxylases) (Mukai et al 2010). STL1 is expressed in osmotic shock conditions (likely to be experienced in sugar-cane juice), and it is also likely that detoxifying phenolic acids may be important in this environment.…”
Section: Interspecific Hybridization and Introgressionmentioning
confidence: 99%