2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2574636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Padawan v SGAE: A Right to Private Copy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different classification as exception or user right is related to the legal nature of private copying. If private copying is a user right, it could signify that end-users are actually in the capacity of invoking this ‘right’ as a legal basis of substantiating claims against potential restrictions of their ability to make private copies and not just an affirmative defence against allegations of copyright infringement [13]. At least one national court has recognized it as a user right.…”
Section: ‘Copy-centrism’ Has Encountered Challenges In the Digitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The different classification as exception or user right is related to the legal nature of private copying. If private copying is a user right, it could signify that end-users are actually in the capacity of invoking this ‘right’ as a legal basis of substantiating claims against potential restrictions of their ability to make private copies and not just an affirmative defence against allegations of copyright infringement [13]. At least one national court has recognized it as a user right.…”
Section: ‘Copy-centrism’ Has Encountered Challenges In the Digitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, ECJ 3rd Chamber), the ECJ’s line of reasoning affirmed that, if users pay the levy in the final price of media and equipment to compensate for the possible harm they cause to the rights holders owing to copying for private use, they are rightly presumed to use the levied media and equipment to make such copies. By affirming that end-users are rightly presumed to use media and equipment to copy, the ECJ confirmed that private copying is, and should function as, a user right [13]. However, considering that technical measures to limit private copying by copyright holders are also reasonable and legitimate under most jurisdictions’ copyright laws, it is better to take private copying as an exception and limitation to the reproduction right.…”
Section: ‘Copy-centrism’ Has Encountered Challenges In the Digitalmentioning
confidence: 99%