2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19909-8_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paid Crowdsourcing, Low Income Contributors, and Subjectivity

Abstract: Scientific projects that require human computation often resort to crowdsourcing. Interested individuals can contribute to a crowdsourcing task, essentially contributing towards the project's goals. To motivate participation and engagement, scientists use a variety of reward mechanisms. The most common motivation, and the one that yields the fastest results, is monetary rewards. By using monetary, scientists address a wider audience to participate in the task. As the payment is below minimum wage for developed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the models presented, and in extent their ensembles, can be further improved by a range of techniques. Test augmentation [70], hyperparameter optimization [71], bias reduction [72] and tailored emotional embeddings [4,73] are some techniques that could further improve the generalization capabilities of our networks. However, the computational load over multiple iterations is extensive, as the most complex models required hours of training per epoch and dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the models presented, and in extent their ensembles, can be further improved by a range of techniques. Test augmentation [70], hyperparameter optimization [71], bias reduction [72] and tailored emotional embeddings [4,73] are some techniques that could further improve the generalization capabilities of our networks. However, the computational load over multiple iterations is extensive, as the most complex models required hours of training per epoch and dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contributors were able to only contribute in one of the tasks, and were excluded from the other three tasks. The use of external crowdsourcing eliminates biases that exist in an internal crowdsourcing task [18]. We ask contributors a simple question "What is the dominant emotion/colour?".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contributors were able to only contribute in one of the tasks, and were excluded from the other three tasks. The use of external crowdsourcing eliminates biases that exist in an internal crowdsourcing task [10]. We ask contributors a simple question "What is the dominant emotion/colour?".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%