2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21030.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pair-instability supernovae via collision runaway in young dense star clusters

Abstract: Stars with helium cores between ∼64 and 133 M⊙ are theoretically predicted to die as pair‐instability supernovae. This requires very massive progenitors, which are theoretically prohibited for Pop II/I stars within the Galactic stellar mass limit due to mass‐loss via line‐driven winds. However, the runaway collision of stars in a dense, young star cluster could create a merged star with sufficient mass to end its life as a pair‐instability supernova, even with enhanced mass‐loss at non‐zero metallicity. We sho… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While spherically symmetric star formation models fail to produce stars more massive than about 20 M⊙ (Kahn 1974;Wolfire & Cassinelli 1987) recent multidimensional simulations have succeeded in obtaining ⋆ E-mail:a.jerkstrand@qub.ac.uk much higher masses (Krumholz et al 2009;Kuiper et al 2010;Cunningham et al 2011). There is also a possibility that some very massive stars are formed via mergers (Bonnell, Bate & Zinnecker 1998;Portegies Zwart et al 1999;Pan, Loeb & Kasen 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While spherically symmetric star formation models fail to produce stars more massive than about 20 M⊙ (Kahn 1974;Wolfire & Cassinelli 1987) recent multidimensional simulations have succeeded in obtaining ⋆ E-mail:a.jerkstrand@qub.ac.uk much higher masses (Krumholz et al 2009;Kuiper et al 2010;Cunningham et al 2011). There is also a possibility that some very massive stars are formed via mergers (Bonnell, Bate & Zinnecker 1998;Portegies Zwart et al 1999;Pan, Loeb & Kasen 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detections of Pop III SNe will be the most direct probe of the first stars in the near term because they are thousands of times brighter than their progenitors and the primitive galaxies that host them Kitayama & Yoshida 2005;Greif et al 2007;Whalen et al 2008c;de Souza et al 2011a;Vasiliev et al 2012;Pan et al 2012b). PI SNe in particular are ideal candidates for finding Pop III stars because of their extreme luminosities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy-injection model involves a rapidly rotating central engine similar in nature to the central engine of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs; e.g., Usov 1992); if this model explains some or all SLSNe, then it would be reasonable to expect similarities between the hosts of SLSNe and the hosts of long-duration GRBs, which are observed to avoid high-metallicity galaxies and occur predominantly at low to intermediate metallicity in the local universe (Stanek et al 2006;Modjaz et al 2008;Graham & Fruchter 2013;Krühler et al 2015;Japelj et al 2016;Perley et al 2016). Other models invoke dynamical interactions and stellar mergers in dense environments (Pan et al 2012;van den Heuvel & Portegies Zwart 2013), which would favor particularly intense starbursts. In any case, regardless of the underlying theoretical model, the degree of similarity or dissimilarity between the hosts of Type I versus Type II events (or between subclasses of these events, or between these events and other classes of SNe) might help establish whether these explosions are closely related or fundamentally different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%