2018
DOI: 10.18620/ctt-1866-8836-2018-7-2-45-53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pair-matched study of cryopreserved versus native graft in adult and pediatric recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we tried to use non-cryopreserved allogeneic grafts whenever possible, and succeeded in 90% of allografts. The reason for this practice is provided by the data from our center, published in 2018 showing higher frequency of primary graft failure with a cryopreserved allogeneic graft [6]. COVID-19positive cases were recorded in eight donors, of which 6 were scheduled for adult patients and 2, for children.…”
Section: Transplant Activity In 2020mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we tried to use non-cryopreserved allogeneic grafts whenever possible, and succeeded in 90% of allografts. The reason for this practice is provided by the data from our center, published in 2018 showing higher frequency of primary graft failure with a cryopreserved allogeneic graft [6]. COVID-19positive cases were recorded in eight donors, of which 6 were scheduled for adult patients and 2, for children.…”
Section: Transplant Activity In 2020mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of these studies are contradictory and mostly were limited by the data of HLA-matched bone marrow transplantations (BMT) [1][2][3][4]. At the same time, the use of cryopreservation in haplo-SCT has practically not been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%