2012
DOI: 10.1307/mmj/1347040254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pairs of additive forms of odd degrees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the most part, the proof of this theorem will proceed along the same lines as the proof of Lemma 1 of [9]. For specific k and p, the problem reduces to finding a nonsingular solution of a particular congruence equation.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the most part, the proof of this theorem will proceed along the same lines as the proof of Lemma 1 of [9]. For specific k and p, the problem reduces to finding a nonsingular solution of a particular congruence equation.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note here that Bovey's method was not used while proving the lemma in [9], and represents a significant computational improvement. This is because checking a particular pair of k and p via Bovey's method is much faster than checking the same pair by testing every possible congruence.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When k 1 = k 2 is even, Brüdern and Godinho [5] confirmed the conjecture for many k (see also Kränzlein [17]). Knapp [16] then showed that the conjecture also holds when R = 2 and k 1 = k 2 are both odd, while Wooley [27] showed that when R = 2, k 1 = 2 and k 2 = 3 then S ≥ 11 suffices to ensure p-adic non-trivial solutions. For larger R little is known (see [4,10,20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much work in the recent literature concerning systems of diagonal equations and their relation to AC (see [6,7,11,12,13,14,15]). In particular, it is known that AC holds for pairs of diagonal forms of equal degree k, except possibly when k takes the form p τ (p − 1) or 3 · 2 τ (p = 2), and that AC holds also for pairs of diagonal forms of distinct odd degrees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%