2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32226-7_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pairwise Semantic Segmentation via Conjugate Fully Convolutional Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By essence, the CNN is built to receive inputs of 2D nature, with multiple channels, however, the key difference lies in its output, where the segmentation mask is generated for the center slice only, and the neighboring slices serve only as context and 3D spatial information providers for the model. The idea in itself is not new, it is clearly stated in [40], but many works opt for this method as it harnesses the benefits of both inputs' dimensions and disposes their disadvantages [41][42][43][44][45][46][47], and others.…”
Section: 5d Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By essence, the CNN is built to receive inputs of 2D nature, with multiple channels, however, the key difference lies in its output, where the segmentation mask is generated for the center slice only, and the neighboring slices serve only as context and 3D spatial information providers for the model. The idea in itself is not new, it is clearly stated in [40], but many works opt for this method as it harnesses the benefits of both inputs' dimensions and disposes their disadvantages [41][42][43][44][45][46][47], and others.…”
Section: 5d Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [58], a complementary network (CompNet) is employed for the segmentation task by attempting to incorporate non-TOI pixels into learning of TOIs ones [99]. A pairwise segmentation technique for sharing supervised segmentation between two paths is investigated by the conjugate FCN (CoFCN) [45], where it takes 2.5D input and learns from adjacent slices explicitly what the segmentation mask should be. In [100], 2D deep belief networks (DBN) is deployed to segment the liver, aided by ASM for post-processing refinement.…”
Section: D Fcnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advent of deep learning, fully convolutional networks (FCNs) have quickly become dominant. These include 2D [36,2], 2.5D [13,43], 3D [28,20,49,46], and hybrid [25,47] FCN-like architectures. Some reported results show that 3D models can improve over 2D ones, but these improvements are sometimes marginal [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to improvements in mean DSCs, these worst-case reductions, with commensurate boosts in reliability, can often be more impactful for clinical applications. Unlike CHASe, most prior work on pathological liver segmentation is fully-supervised [2,13,36,25,20,43,46]. For instance, Wang et al report 96.4% DSC on 26 LiTS volumes and Yang et al [46] report 95% DSC on 50 test volumes with unclear healthy vs pathological status.…”
Section: Pathological Liver Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, we are aware of only one work [9] closely related to ours, where the shape priors and inter-subject similarity were both leveraged within a single DL framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%