2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palaeoenvironmental implications from Lower Volga loess - Joint magnetic fabric and multi-proxy analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The oblate shapes of the Ulantatal AMS ellipsoids are typical features of loess deposits and are commonly related to the dominance of phyllosilicates and gravitational depositional environments (e.g., Bradák et al., 2020; Költringer et al., 2021; Lagroix & Banerjee, 2002; Taylor & Lagroix, 2015; Zhu et al., 2004). Many Ulantatal samples have non‐vertical K min inclination and, in general, comparatively scattered AMS ellipsoid orientations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The oblate shapes of the Ulantatal AMS ellipsoids are typical features of loess deposits and are commonly related to the dominance of phyllosilicates and gravitational depositional environments (e.g., Bradák et al., 2020; Költringer et al., 2021; Lagroix & Banerjee, 2002; Taylor & Lagroix, 2015; Zhu et al., 2004). Many Ulantatal samples have non‐vertical K min inclination and, in general, comparatively scattered AMS ellipsoid orientations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, we filter our data in order to (a) identify the primary depositional fabric and (b) pinpoint statistically significant anisotropy in individual datapoints, which may be indicative of dust transporting wind directions. We utilize the following specimen acceptance criteria (Hus, 2003; Költringer et al., 2021; Lagroix & Banerjee, 2004; Zhu et al., 2004) to achieve this: (a) Statistically significant F , defined by F 23 > 10, vertical K min (inclination >70°), and subhorizontal K max is present; (b) Statistically significant L , defined by F 12 > 4 and E 12 < 20° is present; (c) F is clearly higher than L and has similar trend to P j when plotted against depth (→ F controls the shape of the AMS ellipsoid); (d) The shape of the AMS ellipsoid is oblate ( T > 0). (e) Stereoplot analysis and the principal susceptibility axes indicate gravity controlled and flow‐aligned MF on a horizontal depositional plane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mineral magnetism is widely used in studies of loess deposits, to understand past climate, landscape and postdepositional reworking conditions (e.g. Oches & Banerjee, 1996;Költringer et al, 2021aKöltringer et al, , 2021bBradák, 2009;Bradák et al, 2011). In particular, the magnetic susceptibility of loess, and its frequency dependence, is widely used as a proxy for past soil formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rock magnetism (magnetic properties of rocks) and palaeomagnetic (magnetostratigraphy) methods, especially in combination with lithological-palaeopedological and palynological analyses, serve as a powerful tool in the reconstruction of palaeoenvironmental changes [120][121][122]. Magnetic susceptibility is a sensitive, fast and accurate technique to detect soil pedogenic processes and features and can improve the understanding of soil-forming and, correspondingly, palaeoclimate factors [86,[123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%