2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.104.044046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palatini gravity with nonmetricity, torsion, and boundaries in metric and connection variables

Abstract: We prove the equivalence in the covariant phase space of the metric and connection formulations for Palatini gravity, with nonmetricity and torsion, on a spacetime manifold with boundary. To this end, we will rely on the cohomological approach provided by the relative bicomplex framework. Finally, we discuss some of the physical implications derived from this equivalence in the context of singularity identification through curvature invariants.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plugging the solutions (3.14) into (3.11) leads to This result proves that the metric sector of the metric-HMS theory is equivalent to the metric-EH theory as explained in [37,38]. We have the following on shell identities, Thus, the metric-HMS presymplectic form d HMS ðmÞ defined over the space of solutions Sol ðmÞ HMS is the same as the one of metric-Palatini d HMS ðmÞ which, in turn, has the same functional form as the metric-EH presymplectic form d EH ðmÞ (see [37,38]). In fact, if we define the projection π ðmÞ ðg; QÞ ¼ g, the presymplectic forms canonically associated with the three actions can be related as vol αβμν Riem αβμν vol;…”
Section: Solving For Ssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Plugging the solutions (3.14) into (3.11) leads to This result proves that the metric sector of the metric-HMS theory is equivalent to the metric-EH theory as explained in [37,38]. We have the following on shell identities, Thus, the metric-HMS presymplectic form d HMS ðmÞ defined over the space of solutions Sol ðmÞ HMS is the same as the one of metric-Palatini d HMS ðmÞ which, in turn, has the same functional form as the metric-EH presymplectic form d EH ðmÞ (see [37,38]). In fact, if we define the projection π ðmÞ ðg; QÞ ¼ g, the presymplectic forms canonically associated with the three actions can be related as vol αβμν Riem αβμν vol;…”
Section: Solving For Ssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…where we recall that q μ ¼ vol μαβν Q αβν . The first term of the boundary Lagrangian is the generalized Hawking-Gibbons-York term introduced by Obukhov in [40] (see also [37])…”
Section: Solving For Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We devote this section to summarizing how to define a presymplectic form canonically associated with a local action. For a detailed discussion and some applications see [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: The Covariant Phase Space Formalism In a Nutshellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would like to point out that to use the spin connection as a dynamical gauge connection [25,26], we had to use Palatini formalism and view the spin connection and vierbein as independent variables [58,59]. Then we can view this theory as a non-abelian guage theory on curved spacetime, with spin connection as the gauge potential (for which a dual gauge potential will be constructed).…”
Section: Polyakov Variablementioning
confidence: 99%