2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleobiogeography of Africa: How distinct from Gondwana and Laurasia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
175
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
10
175
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result, along with the recent discovery of a putative early Eocene eosimiid in India (Bajpai et al 2008; see also Rose et al 2009) and the well-supported basal position of this primate family within the anthropoids (Kay et al 1997;Jaeger & Marivaux 2005;Bajpai et al 2008), seems to support a South Asian origin for anthropoids (Beard 2004(Beard , 2006 and a subsequent dispersal into Africa during the middle Eocene. Such a mammalian dispersal event between Africa and South Asia has also been proposed for several groups including anthracotheriid artiodactyls, and anomaluroid and hystricognathous rodents (Tabuce & Marivaux 2005;Gheerbrant & Rage 2006). However, this paleobiogeographical issue for the early evolution of anthropoids is complicated by (i) the morphological gap between African parapithecoids and Asian eosimiids and (ii) the poorly documented omomyiform Altiatlasius from the late Paleocene of Morocco (Sigé et al 1990), which was recently reconsidered either as a stem primate (Tabuce et al 2004;Marivaux 2006;Silcox 2008) or a possible eosimiid-like anthropoid (Beard 2004(Beard , 2006Seiffert et al 2005a;Marivaux 2006;Bajpai et al 2008; our phylogenetic results, see figure S2 in the electronic supplementary material).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This result, along with the recent discovery of a putative early Eocene eosimiid in India (Bajpai et al 2008; see also Rose et al 2009) and the well-supported basal position of this primate family within the anthropoids (Kay et al 1997;Jaeger & Marivaux 2005;Bajpai et al 2008), seems to support a South Asian origin for anthropoids (Beard 2004(Beard , 2006 and a subsequent dispersal into Africa during the middle Eocene. Such a mammalian dispersal event between Africa and South Asia has also been proposed for several groups including anthracotheriid artiodactyls, and anomaluroid and hystricognathous rodents (Tabuce & Marivaux 2005;Gheerbrant & Rage 2006). However, this paleobiogeographical issue for the early evolution of anthropoids is complicated by (i) the morphological gap between African parapithecoids and Asian eosimiids and (ii) the poorly documented omomyiform Altiatlasius from the late Paleocene of Morocco (Sigé et al 1990), which was recently reconsidered either as a stem primate (Tabuce et al 2004;Marivaux 2006;Silcox 2008) or a possible eosimiid-like anthropoid (Beard 2004(Beard , 2006Seiffert et al 2005a;Marivaux 2006;Bajpai et al 2008; our phylogenetic results, see figure S2 in the electronic supplementary material).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…the Comoros and Seychelles archipelagos, and Socotra). The sister group to chameleons (Agamidae) is completely absent from Madagascar, Comoros and Seychelles, although it is distributed across most other East Gondwanan and Laurasian landmasses, which is a pattern common to multiple faunal groups, particularly within mammals and reptiles [5]. The fossil record suggests that the probable common ancestors of chameleons and agamids were distributed across Laurasia in the Mesozoic period [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersal around the western Tethys Gulf was possible in this paleogeographic context, but the fossil record from Middle Jurassic of North and South America is lacking to test this dispersal route. The other possible dispersal way is a trans-Tethyan route accross the Mediterranean Tethyan Sill that was present between Europe and North Africa (Gheerbrant and Rage, 2006) (Fig. 19).…”
Section: Faunal Affinities Paleobiogeographical Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%