2001
DOI: 10.1139/cjes-38-8-1157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleomagnetic reconnaissance of early Mesozoic carbonates from Williston Lake, northeastern British Columbia, Canada: evidence for late Mesozoic remagnetization

Abstract: Three classic sections of Middle and Late Triassic fossiliferous limestones cropping out around Williston Lake in British Columbia, Canada, were sampled for paleomagnetic study. The objective was to test the suitability of these units for detailed magnetobiostratigraphic study with the aim of improving the reference Triassic geomagnetic polarity time scale. The Williston Lake characteristic magnetizations differ, however, from any Triassic North America cratonic reference directions. A satisfactory agreement i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Postdepositional remagnetization may be an even more important cause of discordant paleopoles because it is endemic to virtually all sedimentary rocks. This process utilizes connate or hydrothermal fl uids during burial to facilitate redox chemical reactions that remove existing magnetic minerals and/or generate new magnetic minerals in sedimentary rocks to reset their remanence directions (Muttoni et al, 2001;Moreau et al, 2005). In Baja California since the Late Jurassic, because of its location relative to stable North American paleopoles, remagnetization causes polewarddisplaced and clockwise-rotated paleopoles.…”
Section: Remanence Inclination Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postdepositional remagnetization may be an even more important cause of discordant paleopoles because it is endemic to virtually all sedimentary rocks. This process utilizes connate or hydrothermal fl uids during burial to facilitate redox chemical reactions that remove existing magnetic minerals and/or generate new magnetic minerals in sedimentary rocks to reset their remanence directions (Muttoni et al, 2001;Moreau et al, 2005). In Baja California since the Late Jurassic, because of its location relative to stable North American paleopoles, remagnetization causes polewarddisplaced and clockwise-rotated paleopoles.…”
Section: Remanence Inclination Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, geologic evidence, such as known fault displacements, can only account for *1000 km of northward displacement (e.g., Gabrielse et al 2006), which is far less than the *2000 to *4000 km of post-mid-Cretaceous northward displacements often postulated (e.g., Beck 1980;Irving et al 1985Irving et al , 1996Wynne et al 1995;Johnston 2001;Housen et al 2003;Enkin 2006). Secondly, much of the paleomagnetic evidence for northward displacements of >2000 km comes from sedimentary strata that, unlike igneous rocks, are subject to inclination shallowing by compaction (Kodama 1997;Kodama and Ward 2001) and to easy remagnetization by interstitial meteoric and hydrothermal fluids (Oliver 1992;Symons et al 1999;Enkin et al 2000;Muttoni et al 2001). Both mechanisms, because of the orientation of the APWP relative to the Cordillera, lead to an overestimation of the amount of northward translation (Symons et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%