2019
DOI: 10.1130/b32012.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleomagnetism of the Chuar Group and evaluation of the late Tonian Laurentian apparent polar wander path with implications for the makeup and breakup of Rodinia

Abstract: Paleogeographic models commonly assume that the supercontinent Rodinia was long-lived, with a static geometry involving Mesoproterozoic links that developed during assembly and persisted until Neoproterozoic rifting. However, Rodinian paleogeography and dynamics of continental separation around its centerpiece, Laurentia, remain poorly constrained. On the western Laurentian margin, geological and geochronological data suggest that breakup did not occur until after 720 Ma. Thus, late Tonian (ca. 780–720 Ma) pal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This stratigraphic relationship also implies that the paleomagnetic record from Laurentia may be used to constrain the depositional paleolatitude of the overlying Neoproterozoic sedimentary rocks. Multiple paleomagnetic studies robustly constrain eastern Laurentia (modern eastern and central United States) to low latitudes for most of the Tonian (21)(22)(23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Konnarock Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stratigraphic relationship also implies that the paleomagnetic record from Laurentia may be used to constrain the depositional paleolatitude of the overlying Neoproterozoic sedimentary rocks. Multiple paleomagnetic studies robustly constrain eastern Laurentia (modern eastern and central United States) to low latitudes for most of the Tonian (21)(22)(23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Konnarock Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, any of the orthoquartzites could have been remagnetized in the Late Cretaceous to Cenozoic in the Maria fold and thrust belt, core complexes, or Death Valley regions to give moderate secondary inclinations similar to today's magnetic field. For example, samples from Neoproterozoic-Cambrian sandstones from Grand Canyon and the Uinta Mountains have been completely remagnetized with steep recent chemical remanent magnetizations carried by hematite (Weil et al, 2004(Weil et al, , 2006Eyster et al, 2020). Some of the Zijderveld diagrams from these remagnetized samples (Eyster et al, 2020) look similar to those depicted as primary in Sabbeth et al (2019).…”
Section: Primary or Secondary Magnetization In Source Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, samples from Neoproterozoic-Cambrian sandstones from Grand Canyon and the Uinta Mountains have been completely remagnetized with steep recent chemical remanent magnetizations carried by hematite (Weil et al, 2004(Weil et al, , 2006Eyster et al, 2020). Some of the Zijderveld diagrams from these remagnetized samples (Eyster et al, 2020) look similar to those depicted as primary in Sabbeth et al (2019). Hence, it is possible that some of the Sespe clasts could include a primary direction carried by magnetite (or lower-coercivity hematite) and then a steep overprint carried by high-coercivity hematite (Sabbeth et al, 2019; their supplementary figure S2).…”
Section: Primary or Secondary Magnetization In Source Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, palaeomagnetic data from the Baltica (Walderhaug et al, 2007) suggest that Rodinia had drifted to southerly latitudes, before returning to equatorial latitudes by ca. 750 Ma (Eyster et al, 2019). MER17 modelled significant relative dextral motion between Congo-SF-Azania and Rodinia during this time (870-750 Ma) as well, as suggested by palaeomagnetic data (Evans et al, 2016).…”
Section: Early Tonian Until Rodinia Breakup (1000-750 Ma)mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Fig. 14f, g Macdonald et al, 2013) (see also Colpron et al, 2002;Cox et al, 2018;Eyster et al, 2019). Mulder et al (2018b), while the Ediacaran-Cambrian evolution is after Mulder et al (2020).…”
Section: Australia North China Lhasa and Tasmaniamentioning
confidence: 87%