1994
DOI: 10.1127/njgpm/1994/1994/95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleontological evidence of Upper Proterozoic (Vendian) in the "Zone Münchberg-Frankenberg"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. The stratigraphic age of metasediments in the upper part of the Schist Cover, dated palynologically as Neoproterozoic (Heuse et al, 1994(Heuse et al, , 2010, is not older than Middle/Upper Devonian boundary time, based on detrital zircon dating, and thus fits well into the right-way-up sequence of the Schist Cover. 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3. The stratigraphic age of metasediments in the upper part of the Schist Cover, dated palynologically as Neoproterozoic (Heuse et al, 1994(Heuse et al, , 2010, is not older than Middle/Upper Devonian boundary time, based on detrital zircon dating, and thus fits well into the right-way-up sequence of the Schist Cover. 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…P-T estimates of 0.3 GPa and 660-680°C obtained at the bottom of the Schist Cover (Rötzler & Romer, 2010) imply post-peak extensional telescoping, as the existing rock column overhead is less than half as thick as required to exert a corresponding, essentially lithostatic pressure. Based on palynomorph stratigraphy, Heuse, Kurze, and Reitz (1994) and Heuse et al (2010) inferred a Late Neoproterozoic age for deposits higher in the southeastern Schist Cover. If this age were correct, detrital zircon ages indicating younger deposits deeper in the Schist Cover (Rötzler & Romer, 2010) would involve an inverted stratigraphy.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations