2000
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.71.2.283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleoseismicity: Seismicity Evidence for Past Large Earthquakes

Abstract: Clusters of earthquakes in continental intraplate regions are used to estimate the times and magnitudes of past earthquakes in a model we call "paleoseismicity." The time of a past earthquake is estimated from an Omori-law decay of the aftershocks with time, while the magnitude of the earthquake is inferred from the length of the current zone of seismic activity. The observed aftershocks of several intraplate earthquakes are used to find the parameters describing the Omorilaw aftershock decay, and these parame… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(31 reference statements)
7
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a model incorporating rate-and-state friction, Dieterich (1994) shows that the rate of aftershocks divided by the background seismicity rate is proportional to the mainshock stressing rate normalized by the long-term stress rate. This model is consistent with the observation that long-lived aftershock sequences are relatively common in intraplate regions (Ebel et al, 2000), as intraplate earthquakes are generally thought to be associated with high stress-drop values (Scholz et al, 1986) as well as low background stressing rates. As Stein and Newman (2004) showed, quantitative estimates of aftershock duration in low-strain-rate regions depend critically on parameters that are difficult to determine with precision, but with plausible choices of parameters for the New Madrid sequence, the method of Dieterich (1994) does predict sequences that last for several hundred years.…”
Section: T U"supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Using a model incorporating rate-and-state friction, Dieterich (1994) shows that the rate of aftershocks divided by the background seismicity rate is proportional to the mainshock stressing rate normalized by the long-term stress rate. This model is consistent with the observation that long-lived aftershock sequences are relatively common in intraplate regions (Ebel et al, 2000), as intraplate earthquakes are generally thought to be associated with high stress-drop values (Scholz et al, 1986) as well as low background stressing rates. As Stein and Newman (2004) showed, quantitative estimates of aftershock duration in low-strain-rate regions depend critically on parameters that are difficult to determine with precision, but with plausible choices of parameters for the New Madrid sequence, the method of Dieterich (1994) does predict sequences that last for several hundred years.…”
Section: T U"supporting
confidence: 88%
“…These events may be late-stage aftershocks of the 1945 earthquake, as aftershock sequences have been known to continue for decades or even centuries after the mainshock (Ebel et al, 2000). Taking the fault planes of the shallow thrust earthquakes to be the northward-dipping nodal planes, most have dips of 8-10…”
Section: Receiver Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This event has been interpreted by some studies as a late, large aftershock of the 1811-1812 New Madrid sequence (e.g., Ebel et al, 2000;Stein and Liu, 2009), although the interpretation for a long-lived aftershock sequence has recently been called into question (Page et al, 2012). Whether or not the 1843 event is an aftershock, it was widely felt throughout the region and emerges as an important event for assessing seismic hazard.…”
Section: Historical Moderate Central and Eastern United States Earthqmentioning
confidence: 99%