2019
DOI: 10.1117/1.jei.28.5.059802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palmprint identification performance improvement via patch-based binarized statistical image features (Erratum)

Abstract: identification performance improvement via patch-based binarized statistical image features (Erratum),"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e art color extraction technique is enhanced based on the style extraction of works of art, and a color extraction approach based on color characteristics is provided. e color feature area of works of art is segmented using the sparse dispersed point rearrangement method [18]. Within the search radius of R, the works of art with color characteristics are block segmented, and the appearance texture information feature is retrieved.…”
Section: Feature Information Fusion Of Work Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e art color extraction technique is enhanced based on the style extraction of works of art, and a color extraction approach based on color characteristics is provided. e color feature area of works of art is segmented using the sparse dispersed point rearrangement method [18]. Within the search radius of R, the works of art with color characteristics are block segmented, and the appearance texture information feature is retrieved.…”
Section: Feature Information Fusion Of Work Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study [32], the authors compared the performance of pretrained CNNs for feature extraction in touchless palmprint recognition. Specifically, they employed pretrained AlexNet, VGG-16, and VGG-19 networks to extract features from touchless palmprint images.…”
Section: Deep-learning Approchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the superiority of our proposed model, we conducted comparisons with several recently popular methods, including encoding-based methods such as PalmCode [12], Competitive Code [13], PlamNet [17] and CR-CompCode [18], local descriptor-based methods like HOG [24], LDP [25], LMDP [30] and LMTrP [31] , as well as deep learning-based methods such as AlexNet [33], VGGNet [32], ResNet-18 [54] and PCANet [34]. Additionally, we also compared our proposed method with two recent competitive neural network-based approaches, namely CompNet [35] and CO3Net [36].…”
Section: Recognition Performancementioning
confidence: 99%