Panel Attrition

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.

show abstract

“…This effect, however, is contrary to previous findings by Lugtig (2014), who found negative effects of extraversion on survey cooperation.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Personality has minor effects on panel attrition

Richter

Körtner

Saßenroth

2014

Journal of Research in Personality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, response was rather low despite the participation incentive. While dropout is not uncommon in longitudinal research (Lugtig 2014), it may harm the representativeness of the conclusions. More research is necessary on how to measure student study behaviour in an optimal way, while keeping the burden of participation low.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing the flipped classroom: an exploration of study behaviour and student performance

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The flipped classroom is becoming more popular as a means to support student learning in higher education by requiring students to prepare before lectures and actively engaging students during lectures. While some research has been conducted into student performance in the flipped classroom, students' study behaviour throughout a flipped course has not been investigated. This study explored students' study behaviour throughout a flipped and a regular course by means of bi-weekly diaries. Furthermore, student references to their learning regulation were explored in course evaluations. Results from the diaries showed that students' study behaviour in the flipped course did not appear to be very different from that of students in a regular course. Furthermore, study behaviour did not appear strongly related to student performance in both the flipped and the regular course. Exploration of student references to their learning regulation in the course evaluations showed that some students experienced the flipped course design as intended to support their learning process. Other students, however, demonstrated resistance to changing their study behaviour even though changing study behaviour is expected in order to benefit from the flipped classroom. Further research on the relationship between students' learning regulation and actual study behaviour and course results is necessary to understand when and why implementing the flipped classroom is successful. Recommendations that may help more effective flipped classroom implementation include considering the prior history between students and instructor(s), the broader curriculum context, and frequent expectation communication especially with large numbers of students and non-mandatory lecture attendance.

show abstract

“…Predictors of attrition from face-to-face studies only partly apply to online studies. In the online probability-based LISS Panel, Lugtig (2014) finds age, education, income, being provided a computer, ''Big Five'' psychological characteristics, survey enjoyment, and burden to be predictive of attrition.…”

Section: Measures and Analysis Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Respondent Conditioning in Online Panel Surveys

Struminskaya

2015

Social Science Computer Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we investigate changes in survey reporting due to prior interviewing. Two field experiments were implemented in a probability-based online panel in which the order of the questionnaires was switched. Although experimental methods for studying panel conditioning are favorable, experiments in longitudinal studies are rare. Studies on conditioning demand additional resources and might influence respondents' answers. Panel conditioning is mostly associated with measurement errors. However, the discussion that sees it exclusively as a negative phenomenon is not comprehensive. Learning the rules of the interview may lead to increases or decreases in data quality (advantageous vs. disadvantageous conditioning). Overall, little evidence of advantageous conditioning and no disadvantageous conditioning is found. Apart from this reassuring finding, this aricle advances the field by using propensity score weighting to account for attrition and other confounding factors and by using paradata to evaluate the plausibility of alternative explanations of panel conditioning.

show abstract

Panel Attrition

Cited by 125 publications

References 28 publications

Personality has minor effects on panel attrition

Personality has minor effects on panel attrition

Implementing the flipped classroom: an exploration of study behaviour and student performance

Respondent Conditioning in Online Panel Surveys

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About