2016
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199359943.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Panpsychism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is certainly not more reasonable to take consciousness to be a fundamental, non-structural feature of reality. So far there have been no theoretical gains, measured by parsimony considerations in any case, derived from the recently passed vogue of neo-dualisms, nor from the current surprising (but also surely ephemeral) vogue of panpsychism and related views in analytical philosophy of mind (see, e.g., Brüntrup and Jaskolla, 2016).…”
Section: The “Hard Problem” Representationalism and Phenomenal Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is certainly not more reasonable to take consciousness to be a fundamental, non-structural feature of reality. So far there have been no theoretical gains, measured by parsimony considerations in any case, derived from the recently passed vogue of neo-dualisms, nor from the current surprising (but also surely ephemeral) vogue of panpsychism and related views in analytical philosophy of mind (see, e.g., Brüntrup and Jaskolla, 2016).…”
Section: The “Hard Problem” Representationalism and Phenomenal Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can envision that the development of such a philosophy may have had parallels to contemporary debates in consciousness studies around the “hard problem of consciousness” ( Chalmers, 1995 ), i.e, how does the qualitative or experiential aspect of consciousness relate to something material like the brain. Indeed, one of solutions offered for resolving the hard problem is through panpsychic or cosmopsychic theories of consciousness ( Brüntrup and Jaskolla, 2017 ; Goff et al, 2021 ), paralleling Yogic and Vedantic notions of consciousness ( Vaidya and Bilimoria, 2015 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%