Pantazis, C., Gordon, D. and Levitas, R. (Eds.) (2006) <i>Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey</i>. Bristol: The Policy Press. pp. 488, £24.99, pbk

Goulden, Chris

doi:10.1017/s0047279407301025

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most studies that have followed the implications of child poverty use household income as a measure for poverty. This kind of measure has numerous advantages (such as ability continuality and comparability) and also has limitations, especially when children are the unit of observation (Adamson et al, 2007;Adelman et al, 2003;Gordon, 2006;Main & Bradshaw, 2012;Saunders et al, 2007;Townsend, 1979). Furthermore, when studying children directly, most children do not know how to answer questions about household income (Knies, 2011).…”

Section: Materials Well-being Association With Swb Among Childrenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Material deprivation and subjective poverty association with subjective well-being reported by children: Religiosity as a protective factor.

Gross-Manos¹,

Massarwi²

2022

American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores the association between material deprivation and subjective poverty with children's subjective well-being (SWB) as well as the possible moderating effect of religiosity on this correlation among a representative sample of 2,733 Israeli fourth and sixth graders, Jews, and Arabs. All measures were based on children's reports, using a survey. The findings show that religiosity plays a protective role in this association. For children with stronger religious beliefs, the association between material deprivation and subjective poverty with subjective well-being is weaker and even insignificant in some of the models, which explains 28%-33% of the variance. Religious practice is not found to have a significant moderating effect on the association between material well-being and subjective well-being, suggesting that religiosity manifests differently among children and adults. These results show the significance that religiosity can play among children at risk as a protective factor. In light of the findings, we emphasize the importance of developing culturally sensitive interventions when tackling child poverty, taking into consideration the role of religiosity in their lives and its impact on children's well-being. More studies are needed, aiming at explaining the effect of religiosity on children's well-being.

show abstract

Section: Materials Well-being Association With Swb Among Childrenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Material deprivation and subjective poverty association with subjective well-being reported by children: Religiosity as a protective factor.

Gross-Manos¹,

Massarwi²

2022

American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Poverty is a complex and pervasive experience typically characterised by a lack of resources needed to maintain a standard of living equivalent to the norms of the society in which a person lives (Gordon, 2006). When household finances are strained, food becomes a flexible resource with the quality and quantity available being dependent on what can be afforded once other, more pressing, financial commitments are met (Kennedy, 2014).…”

Section: Food Insecuritymentioning

confidence: 99%

Food insecurity, poor dietary intake and a lack of free meal uptake amongst 16–17‐year‐old college students in the northeast of England, UK

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Food insecurity in the UK has been described as a public health emergency. Although programmes exist to alleviate food insecurity for children and families, there is a lack of focus on 16-17 year olds across research, policy and practice. The current study set out to address this gap by investigating the food insecurity status and food intake of 16-17-year-olds relative to current nutritional guidelines.An online, cross-sectional survey design was utilised to collect data on self-reported food security status, food intake and access to and uptake of free college meals.Eighty-three students aged 16-17 years from two sixth form colleges based in the North East of England, UK participated. Food intake data were compared to current dietary recommendations on fruit and vegetable intake and high fat/salt/sugar foods; food intake was compared between food secure and food insecure young people. A minority of young people consumed enough fruit and vegetables to meet or exceed current 5-a-day dietary recommendations, but the majority of young people consumed two or more high fat/salt/sugar items, consumption of which was higher in food insecure young people. Additionally, despite almost half the current sample identifying as food insecure, only four young people reported being entitled to free college

show abstract

“…In the last decade, the rise of the inequality question at a UK but also global level has led to the publication of countless books and reports at home and abroad that broke with previous publications addressing social exclusion and poverty (Gordon, 2006). These publications tend to focus either on the causes or consequences of inequalities, in the United Kingdom and abroad.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction

Fée¹,

Kober‐Smith

2017

Inequalities in the UK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pantazis, C., Gordon, D. and Levitas, R. (Eds.) (2006) Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey. Bristol: The Policy Press. pp. 488, £24.99, pbk

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Material deprivation and subjective poverty association with subjective well-being reported by children: Religiosity as a protective factor.

Material deprivation and subjective poverty association with subjective well-being reported by children: Religiosity as a protective factor.

Food insecurity, poor dietary intake and a lack of free meal uptake amongst 16–17‐year‐old college students in the northeast of England, UK

Introduction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About