study objective: To explore the effect of gaboxadol on NREM EEG in transient insomnia using power spectral analysis and evaluate the response between men and women. methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, 3-way, parallel-group transient insomnia study in 22 sleep laboratories. After a baseline night (N1), subjects underwent a 4-h phase-advance of their habitual sleep time the following night (N2). Healthy subjects aged 18-64 y were given singleblind placebo on N1 followed by double-blind treatment on N2 (gaboxadol 10 mg [n = 271], 15 mg [n = 274], or placebo [n = 277]) Results: At baseline, women showed signifi cantly greater values in low frequency activity (< 10 Hz) and in high spindle/ low beta frequency activity (14-18 Hz) compared to men. During the phase advance (placebo N2-baseline N1), there was a signifi cant increase in power within the high spindle/low beta frequency range (15-17 Hz) and a signifi cant reduction in beta activity (20-32 Hz), which was greater in women than men. Gaboxadol induced a signifi cant (dose-related) increase in low frequencies (< 8 Hz) and a signifi cant (dose-related) decrease within the alpha/spindle range (11-12 Hz). The effect was dependent upon sex, with a greater magnitude of effect observed in women than men. Conclusion: Gaboxadol shows a characteristic NREM EEG spectral profi le in a model of transient insomnia. Men and women show clear differences in NREM EEG activity at baseline, to gaboxadol treatment and to phase-shifts in habitual sleep/wake times. The exact mechanisms underlying the sex differences remain unclear, but sex is an important variable in studies evaluating sleep and gaboxadol.
s C I e N t I F I C I N V e s t I G A t I o N sT he functional signifi cance of individual differences in SWS and the pharmacological enhancement of SWS is under intense investigation. [1][2][3][4] The clinical interest in a SWS-enhancing agent, one that augments delta activity, is that such agents may be able to do so in a subject group with diminished SWS/SWA (e.g., aging and males) and thereby provide some form of benefi t to the individual in terms of sleep, daytime performance, and ultimately quality of life. Sex (gender) is beginning to emerge as one of the key predictors of individual differences of SWS under normal sleep conditions, but it is not known whether sex can contribute to the individual differences observed in sleep disruption or in specifi c pharmacological manipulations of SWS. Even though gaboxadol is no longer in clinical development for insomnia, it can be used as a pharmacological research tool with a unique mechanism of action, and specifi cally one that enhances SWS. Ultimately such investigations may lead to a better understanding of both the functional signifi cance of SWS as well as the profound sex differences in the prevalence of insomnia.Gaboxadol is a novel selective extrasynaptic GABA A agonist with the α 4 δ containing receptors currently seeming the most relevant target for mediating its hypnotic activity.5 This receptor subtype occurs ...