2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2017.03.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paragenesis of multiple platinum-group mineral populations in Shetland ophiolite chromitite: 3D X-ray tomography and in situ Os isotopes

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PPGM are hollingworthite and scarce hongshiite (PtCu), Pt-alloy (Pt-Pd-Cu), genkinite and Pd-, Rh-and Ni-bearing antimonides totalling 9 grains only (<10%;Table 2). The survey byPrichard et al (2017) corroborates that PPGM, including minor sperrylite, Pt-Fe alloys and platarsite, typically occur in clusters with Ru-pentlandite and some IPGM interstitially to chromite grains.The placer PGM located at Harold's Grave (n=3 grains) consist of laurite, iridium alloy and osmium alloy, with sizes ranging from 20 to 60 µm. No PPGM or pentlandite were recovered(Table 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PPGM are hollingworthite and scarce hongshiite (PtCu), Pt-alloy (Pt-Pd-Cu), genkinite and Pd-, Rh-and Ni-bearing antimonides totalling 9 grains only (<10%;Table 2). The survey byPrichard et al (2017) corroborates that PPGM, including minor sperrylite, Pt-Fe alloys and platarsite, typically occur in clusters with Ru-pentlandite and some IPGM interstitially to chromite grains.The placer PGM located at Harold's Grave (n=3 grains) consist of laurite, iridium alloy and osmium alloy, with sizes ranging from 20 to 60 µm. No PPGM or pentlandite were recovered(Table 2).…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…consists of laurite, osmium, irarsite and IrSbS. The size of the IPGM in the rocks ranges from a few microns to 500 µm, as found byBadanina et al (2013Badanina et al ( , 2016 from concentrates of the rocks produced using the hydroseparation technique, and byPrichard et al (2017) using 3D X-ray tomography. The PPGM are hollingworthite and scarce hongshiite (PtCu), Pt-alloy (Pt-Pd-Cu), genkinite and Pd-, Rh-and Ni-bearing antimonides totalling 9 grains only (<10%;Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Os isotope data of O'Driscoll et al (2012) indicate that Cliff chromitites are more radiogenic ( 187 Os/ 188 Os initial of ~0.1292) than other SOC chromitites (0.125), potentially supporting the role of a hydrothermal fluid that had interacted with the metasediments in the provision of the As. In fact, Prichard et al (2017) recently reported variable Os isotope compositions for two PGM grains from Cliff ( 187 Os/ 188 Os between 0.1270-0.1300), suggesting the presence of >1 PGM paragenesis, i.e., that the more radiogenic Os isotope compositions observed at Cliff may be controlled by a specific PGM paragenesis. In this scenario, which is our preferred interpretation, we envisage that As-rich fluids altered the existing sulphide assemblage in the Cliff chromitites, such that the high PGE concentrations probably reflect the original chromitite PGE budgets, albeit with reworking and upgrading of the PPGE in particular.…”
Section: Arsenide As a Collector Of Pge At Cliffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we combine X-ray microtomography (μCT) with petrography and mineral chemistry to visualise the 3D distribution and microstructure of the base-and precious metal-rich phases and link this to their chemical signatures. Establishing the microstructural relationships between Cr-spinel, base-metal phases and the PGM in chromitite is pivotal to understanding the petrogenesis of these deposits; distinguishing between these high density phases is an objective particularly well-addressed by μCT (e.g., Ketchum and Carlson 2001;Godel et al 2010;Godel et al 2013;Godel, 2015;Prichard et al 2017). The key goal in this study is to elucidate the distribution of the PGE between specific carrier phases and link this to the chromitite microstructure and mineral chemistry to formulate a comprehensive petrogenetic interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%