The 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2012.6252681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel algorithms for tensor product-based inexact graph matching

Abstract: In this paper we face the inexact graph matching problem from the parallel algorithms viewpoint. After a brief introduction of both graph matching and parallel computing contexts, we discuss a specific method of performing inexact graph matching based on the well known tensor product operator. We analyze the problem using two parallel computing models, following different algorithmic strategies, and performing also an experimental evaluation. The aim of this paper is to provide modeling and algorithmic strateg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We seek a pair of paths with matching labels on both nodes and edges, where one path goes from root to leaf in the pattern graph and the other path is in the state transition graph. The matching relation between labels that we define allows for non-exact matches; namely the symbol * is allowed to match both I and D. This is a type of approximate graph matching [24,25,26,27]. If such a pair exists, then the model is consistent with the data and cannot be rejected.…”
Section: Dsgrn Model Consistency With a Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We seek a pair of paths with matching labels on both nodes and edges, where one path goes from root to leaf in the pattern graph and the other path is in the state transition graph. The matching relation between labels that we define allows for non-exact matches; namely the symbol * is allowed to match both I and D. This is a type of approximate graph matching [24,25,26,27]. If such a pair exists, then the model is consistent with the data and cannot be rejected.…”
Section: Dsgrn Model Consistency With a Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DS-G-454, instead, we process input patterns that are labeled graphs. Therefore, we implement the kernel function as the graph coverage kernel [22,26]. DS-454 is a subset of DS-1811, and therefore the same classification systems described for DS-1811 apply here.…”
Section: The Considered Pattern Recognition Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, the work of Livi et al [23] contains an algorithmic motif concerning parallel graph tensor product calculations for inexact graph matching, while their formulation also has a product weight matrix that is computed using a vertex kernel and an edge kernel. However, the product graph is not used to construct a linear system that has to be solved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%