2012
DOI: 10.1177/1077546312464681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel neural network combined with sliding mode control in overhead crane control system

Abstract: A novel control for a nonlinear two-dimensional (2-D) overhead crane is proposed. Instead of the complex design procedures used in classic methods, the proposed scheme combines the principles of neural networks (NNs) and variable structure systems (VSS) to derive control signals needed to drive the cart smoothly, rapidly and with limited payload swing. The merits include the robustness and model-free properties of the sliding mode and neural based controllers, respectively. Simulations performed using a scaled… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to their inability to cope with perturbations and disturbances, some researchers combined them with closed‐loop controllers to improve the control performance . As for closed‐loop control schemes, it can be further categorized into proportional integral derivative, linear quadratic regulator, model predictive control (MPC), adaptive control, sliding mode control, etc. The closed‐loop control schemes listed above are all model‐based methods, which suggests that their control performances severely depend on the accurate mathematical modeling of overhead crane systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to their inability to cope with perturbations and disturbances, some researchers combined them with closed‐loop controllers to improve the control performance . As for closed‐loop control schemes, it can be further categorized into proportional integral derivative, linear quadratic regulator, model predictive control (MPC), adaptive control, sliding mode control, etc. The closed‐loop control schemes listed above are all model‐based methods, which suggests that their control performances severely depend on the accurate mathematical modeling of overhead crane systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closed-loop control schemes listed above are all model-based methods, which suggests that their control performances severely depend on the accurate mathematical modeling of overhead crane systems. When accurate system dynamics cannot be obtained, intelligent control methods, such as neural network, 15,27,30 fuzzy logic control, 18,28,31,32 and genetic algorithm, 33 can be used.Some closed-loop control methods first generate a reference trajectory and design the online controller to track the reference trajectory. 12,14 Generally speaking, it is difficult to achieve fast transportation and efficient suppressing of swing angles by tracking the reference trajectory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sun et al [28] designed an adaptive control scheme to deal with the control problem of tower crane systems with parametric uncertainties without approximating the non-linear dynamics. There are also some intelligent control methods applied in crane systems such as fuzzy control [29,30], genetic algorithm [31], and neural network [32]. According to the operating experience of real cranes, it is also essential to design suitable trajectories for the system states (positions, velocities, and accelerations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Sun et al [10,11] present antiswing controllers to regulate the cargo position to the desired location asymptotically in the presence of ship roll and heave movements for offshore crane systems applied in modern ocean transportation and logistics. Moreover, existing methods also include input shaping [12][13][14][15], feedback control [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], intelligent control [29][30][31][32], and trajectory planning method [33][34][35][36]. Specifically, several input shapers are designed to reduce payload swing of bridge crane systems [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%