2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46376-6_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel Sorting for GPUs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider the following contextual signature of an abstract component called Sorting, representing a family of concrete components, each one representing a particular parallel implementation of a well-known sorting algorithm, such as Quicksort, Mergesort, Bitonic Sort, Heapsort, Radix Sort, and so on [49,53,54]:…”
Section: Parallel Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the following contextual signature of an abstract component called Sorting, representing a family of concrete components, each one representing a particular parallel implementation of a well-known sorting algorithm, such as Quicksort, Mergesort, Bitonic Sort, Heapsort, Radix Sort, and so on [49,53,54]:…”
Section: Parallel Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm of [34] was used by [8] in the context of integer sorting; initial local sorting involved radix-sort. Subsequently [9,10] utilized this approach for GPU sorting of arbitrary (not necessarily integer) keys. Similarly to the approach of [13,15] but differently, a sample of size ps is being used rather than the p(p − 1)s of [13,15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to the approach of [13,15] but differently, a sample of size ps is being used rather than the p(p − 1)s of [13,15]. The GPU architecture's block thread size determines p and other GPU constraints dictate s. Thus effectively the implied oversampling factor of [13,15] becomes s/(p − 1) in [9,10]. [30] also performs GPU sorting by using a bitonic sorting method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations