Transactions on Engineering Technologies 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8832-8_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallelization of Minimum Spanning Tree Algorithms Using Distributed Memory Architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dehne et al [23] provide several practical algorithms and an evaluation on up to 16 cores for dense graphs with m/n > p. This condition essentially ensures that the memory of each machine is large enough to hold all vertices of the graph. Loncar et al [24] propose distributed variants of the Kruskal and Jarnik-Prim algorithm that also rely on replicated vertices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dehne et al [23] provide several practical algorithms and an evaluation on up to 16 cores for dense graphs with m/n > p. This condition essentially ensures that the memory of each machine is large enough to hold all vertices of the graph. Loncar et al [24] propose distributed variants of the Kruskal and Jarnik-Prim algorithm that also rely on replicated vertices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the mentioned algorithms are adapted for implementation on distributed memory systems [13,14,15,16,17]. Among the parallel implementations listed above there is not one implementation scalable to at least one hundred parallel processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some algorithms are suitable for shared memory parallelization, there are lot of such implementations, for example [7,8,9,10]. Some of the mentioned algorithms are adapted for implementation on distributed memory systems [13,14,15,16,17]. Among the parallel implementations listed above there is not one implementation scalable to at least one hundred parallel processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%