1990 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.1990.693601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallelization Of The EM Algorithm For 3D PEt Image Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this leads to substantial cost savings, Fourier rebinning again assumes that the data are measurements of line integrals so that the potential for resolution recovery is lost with this approach. Several other investigators have approached the problem using a combination of sparse matrix structures and in-plane and axial symmetries to reduce computation and storage requirements (Chen et al 1991, Johnson et al 1995, 1997, Ollinger and Goggin 1996, Terstegge et al 1996. These methods model the detection process using geometrical computations based either on the intersection of detection 'tubes' with each voxel (Ollinger and Goggin 1996) or on depth dependent geometric sensitivity calculations based on the solid angles subtended at the detectors by each voxel (Chen et al 1991, Terstegge et al 1996.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this leads to substantial cost savings, Fourier rebinning again assumes that the data are measurements of line integrals so that the potential for resolution recovery is lost with this approach. Several other investigators have approached the problem using a combination of sparse matrix structures and in-plane and axial symmetries to reduce computation and storage requirements (Chen et al 1991, Johnson et al 1995, 1997, Ollinger and Goggin 1996, Terstegge et al 1996. These methods model the detection process using geometrical computations based either on the intersection of detection 'tubes' with each voxel (Ollinger and Goggin 1996) or on depth dependent geometric sensitivity calculations based on the solid angles subtended at the detectors by each voxel (Chen et al 1991, Terstegge et al 1996.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the statistically based 3D reconstruction methods are based on the EM (Chen et al 1991, Johnson et al 1995 or OSEM (Johnson et al 1997) algorithms. Both approaches can exhibit high-variance behaviour at high iteration numbers and are regularized through early termination of the algorithm or by subsequent smoothing of the reconstructed images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By choosing the voxel size in the z direction to be an integer fraction of the ring distance, we have in-plane rotation symmetries, axial reflection symmetry, and parallel symmetry in P geom as described in [4,5,7]. The non-zero elements of P geom are stored using automated voxel indexing in a ray-driven projector format.…”
Section: A Factorization Of the Projection Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fY g RM p;q k;l = f Y g R p;q 2k;l + f Y g R p;q 2k + 1 ; l (5) In contrast to FBP methods based on the line integral model, the statistically based approach allows us to explicitly model these data compression procedures in our geometric projection matrix, P geom . To do this, we first compute p geom i; j for all ring differences, d = 0 ; 1 ; 2 ; : : : ; d max = 2 2 .…”
Section: B Axial Rebinning and Angular Mashingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation