It has long been tacitly assumed that a psychologically meaningful interpretation of intelligence-test results depends on presupposing some sort of "uniform development" of the different functions involved in the passing of the various test items. An unevenness of functioning, as indicated by the test, then becomes the basis for interpreting the test results as indicating "retardation," "impairment," or "deterioration." Unfortunately, the test most widely used clinically-the Stanford-Binet-is a test which hardly lends itself to such treatment because of the great variety of tasks included in it without regard to their psychological significance. Attempts may be made, as for instance the recent one by Roe and Shakow (1), to give structure to the test by a logical grouping of the items into categories according to their psychological meaning. The results reached by the excellent and meticulous treatment of Roe and Shakow are based in large part on these particular groupings of varied items, and other investigator* with different experience and ideas might well be unsatisfied with some of the groupings.Clinical psychologists who used the test, and were interested in the problem of equal and unequal efficiency pf the functions involved in the solving of different items of the test, were forced to turn to the analysis of "passes" and "failures" on each year level as the basis for clinical inferences. This distribution of "passes" and "failures" was referred to as scatter or range, and various measures were devised to indicate the extent of scatter. Harris and Shakow •The data referred to in this paper are part of the results of an extensive investigation evaluating a wide variety of clinical testing procedures. This investigation was sponsored jointly by the Josiah Macy Junior Foundation and the Menninger Foundation.Dr. Merton M. Gill, psychiatrist at the Menninger Clinic, is responsible for the final classification of cases used in this study, and also for the psychiatric examination and classification of our control subjects. Acknowledgment is also due Miss Suzanne Reichard, M.A., who assisted in the collection and organization of the data for this research.