2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter estimation and bias correction for diffusion processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
161
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
161
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result echoes the conjecture of Hurwicz (1950) about the bias in the autoregressive (AR) estimate in the discrete time AR(1) model. Second, we show that the bias formula, which mimics that of Marriott and Pope (1954) and Kendall (1954) for the discrete time model and that of Tang and Chen (2009) for continuous time models, is essentially linear in coe¢ cient. Consequently, the bias predicted by the formula does not disappear in the unit root case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result echoes the conjecture of Hurwicz (1950) about the bias in the autoregressive (AR) estimate in the discrete time AR(1) model. Second, we show that the bias formula, which mimics that of Marriott and Pope (1954) and Kendall (1954) for the discrete time model and that of Tang and Chen (2009) for continuous time models, is essentially linear in coe¢ cient. Consequently, the bias predicted by the formula does not disappear in the unit root case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The simpler expression mimics the bias formula derived by Marriott and Pope (1954) for the discrete time AR model and corresponds to the bias formula derived independently by Tang and Chen (2009) for the same model but with unknown mean. The complicated one includes an additional term from the exact evaluation of the Cesaro sums.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This upward bias in the mean-reversion parameter estimate is well established (see Tang and Chen, 2009;Wang, Phillips, and Yu, 2011). In particular, for values of κ close to zero, i.e., a near unit root situation typical of many financial time series, a bias correction may be preferable (Yu, 2012).…”
Section: Simulation Results: Monthly and Quarterly Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If δt is not small, the estimators in (3.4) are biased. Therefore, let us also consider the more exact maximum likelihood (ML) estimatorsθ ex := (μ ex ,θ ex ,σ ex ), as discussed in, e.g, [17]. By omitting the assumption δt → 0 and using the Markovian nature of the OU process, these exact ML estimators follow from maximizing the log likelihood function:…”
Section: Unconditional Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%