2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.3.104602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter estimation for complex thermal-fluid flows using approximate Bayesian computation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buoyant jets and plumes are found in a variety of natural and engineering contexts, including industrial burners (Christopher et al 2018;Hayden et al 2019), hydrothermal vents (Gaskin & Wood 2001) and volcanic plumes (Campion et al 2018). Despite their obvious differences, each of these flows exhibit a similar 'puffing' phenomenon that results from the continuous injection of less dense fluid into a reservoir of more dense, ambient fluid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buoyant jets and plumes are found in a variety of natural and engineering contexts, including industrial burners (Christopher et al 2018;Hayden et al 2019), hydrothermal vents (Gaskin & Wood 2001) and volcanic plumes (Campion et al 2018). Despite their obvious differences, each of these flows exhibit a similar 'puffing' phenomenon that results from the continuous injection of less dense fluid into a reservoir of more dense, ambient fluid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With more pyrolysis and combustion relevant species, comparisons to the mid-infrared frequency comb measurements of Makowiecki et al (2020b) will be possible with the inclusion of the reduced biomass combustion model published by Glusman et al (2019). Moreover, coupling these computationally efficient simulations with parameter estimation methods such as approximate Bayesian computation (Christopher et al, 2018), could allow for automated estimation of simulation parameters (i.e., heat of reaction and Arrhenius reaction coefficients) as well as initial conditions (i.e., temperature and water mole fraction) and/or boundary conditions (i.e., unmeasured parameters during experimental procedure).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ABC method was introduced, and first widely applied, in population genetics [20][21][22], and was subsequently implemented in a wide range of other scientific areas [23][24][25][26][27][28] (detailed reviews are provided by CsillĂ©ry et al [29], Marin et al [30], Lintusaari et al [31], Sisson et al [32], and Beaumont [33]). More recently, ABC has been employed in engineering contexts for the estimation of rate coefficients in chemical kinetic models [34], for the estimation of boundary conditions in complex thermal-fluid flows [35], and for determining unknown model parameters in autonomic [36] and nonlinear [37] subgrid-scale closure models for LES. Doronina et al [14] were the first to take advantage of ABC-MCMC for discovering model parameter values and uncertainties in a multi-parameter RANS closure, using relatively simple homogeneous test cases as reference data for calibration of a nonequilibrium turbulence model [38][39][40] consisting of three coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs).…”
Section: Approximate Bayesian Computation With Markov Chain Monte Car...mentioning
confidence: 99%