2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter estimation of a two-component neutron star model with spin wandering

Abstract: It is an open challenge to estimate systematically the physical parameters of neutron star interiors from pulsar timing data while separating spin wandering intrinsic to the pulsar (achromatic timing noise) from measurement noise and chromatic timing noise (due to propagation effects). In this paper we formulate the classic two-component, crust-superfluid model of neutron star interiors as a noise-driven, linear dynamical system and use a state-space-based expectation-maximization method to estimate the system… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerns about inferences on the CRN pr ocess have arisen on the basis that some MSPs may exhibit similar timing noise characteristics (Shannon & Cordes 2010;Goncharov et al 2021a), which may result in a false-alarm detection of a CRN. Indeed, Meyers et al (2021) suggest that pulsar timing noise induced by spin irregularities has a spectral index of 4, close to the 13/3 value expected for a GWB. Incorrect or incomplete models for pulsarintrinsic noise terms can bias searches for, or prevent detection of, the GWB (Goncharov et al 2021b;Hazboun et al 2020;Lasky et al 2015;Cordes 2013).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Concerns about inferences on the CRN pr ocess have arisen on the basis that some MSPs may exhibit similar timing noise characteristics (Shannon & Cordes 2010;Goncharov et al 2021a), which may result in a false-alarm detection of a CRN. Indeed, Meyers et al (2021) suggest that pulsar timing noise induced by spin irregularities has a spectral index of 4, close to the 13/3 value expected for a GWB. Incorrect or incomplete models for pulsarintrinsic noise terms can bias searches for, or prevent detection of, the GWB (Goncharov et al 2021b;Hazboun et al 2020;Lasky et al 2015;Cordes 2013).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Therefore, to calculate the Power Spectral Density (PSD) of the process we can not rely on the Wiener-Khinchin theorem. However, it is still possible to perform the Fourier transformed Langevin equation and use the frequency representation of the white-noise (Rice 1944), see also Meyers et al (2021a). First, we introduce the Fourier representation…”
Section: Multi-component Systems With Additive Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently from Meyers et al (2021a), we do not include the additive noise terms as independent fluctuations in Ω 𝑝 and Ω 1 . Rather, we ascribe them to different independent physical mechanisms: the external (electromagnetic) and internal (vortex-mediated) torques.…”
Section: Two-component Model (𝑚 = 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distribution of the braking force will be calculated if the magnetic field structure inside the star is given, and thereafter one can discuss the angular momentum transfer inside the star. The spindown evolution including the glitches and any other kinds of timing noise was discussed with the two-component, crust-superfluid, models (Baym et al 1969;Haskell & Melatos 2015;Meyers, Melatos, & O'Neill 2021), where the torque distribution inside the star was not taken into account. Our present study demonstrates that the braking torque distribution for a given magnetic field can be calculated and hence a more detailed modelling of the spin-down history than ever conducted is possible.…”
Section: Magnetospheric Current Inside the Starmentioning
confidence: 99%