2003 European Control Conference (ECC) 2003
DOI: 10.23919/ecc.2003.7084959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter optimisation in iterative learning control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…if 0 < < 2, then ke kþ1 k ¼ j1 À kje k k < ke k k for all k where e k 6 ¼ 0. It is easily seen that this monotonicity property is a very strong and valuable theoretical and practical property of ILC methods (see Amann et al (1996) and Owens and Feng (2003)) as it indicates a guarantee of improved performance from trial to trial. In what follows the robustness of the inverse-model ILC algorithm is analysed under the constraint that control performance retains monotonic error convergence in the presence of model uncertainty.…”
Section: The Inverse Model Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…if 0 < < 2, then ke kþ1 k ¼ j1 À kje k k < ke k k for all k where e k 6 ¼ 0. It is easily seen that this monotonicity property is a very strong and valuable theoretical and practical property of ILC methods (see Amann et al (1996) and Owens and Feng (2003)) as it indicates a guarantee of improved performance from trial to trial. In what follows the robustness of the inverse-model ILC algorithm is analysed under the constraint that control performance retains monotonic error convergence in the presence of model uncertainty.…”
Section: The Inverse Model Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This section extends the inverse model algorithm into a parameter optimal iterative learning control (POILC) framework and derives convergence and robustness results that parallel the case considered in the previous sections. As background, consider the recently introduced simple form of POILC (Owens and Feng 2003) where a scalar gain is varied adaptively with iteration in an 'Arimoto-type' algorithm of the form…”
Section: Inverse Type Parameter Optimal Ilcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to the concept of parameteroptimal ILC, which is discussed in detail in Reference [11]. Note that the analysis here considers monotonic convergence only in the l 2 -norm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0 as t s ! 1: Hence, as is discussed in Reference [11], the matrix G e in (7) becomes diagonal, and positivity is guaranteed if CG > 0: Thus by increasing the sampling time, an originally non-positive definite plant can be conditioned to become positive asymptotically. This result is illustrated experimentally in Section 10 using an aliasing approach, which 'artificially' decreases the sampling rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without loss of generality (see [6]), it will be assumed that CG > 0 and that system (1) is controllable and observable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%