2022
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2098074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterisation of demand-driven material requirements planning: a multi-objective genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second topic is the study and improvement of the method itself. For example, Martin, Lauras, Baptiste, Lamothe, Fouqu and Miclo (2019) develop a process control and a decision-making tool to adjust buffer parameters, Lee and Rim (2019) propose an alternative model for the safety stock calculation, while Achergui, Allaoui and Hsu (2020) develop an algorithm to solve the optimization problem of minimizing storing costs for uncapacitated buffer positioning and (Damand, Lahrichi & Barth, 2023) propose a multi-objective genetic algorithm to determine a set of parameters related to DDMRP. Recently, Dessevre et al (2021) propose a visual tool to correlate service rate, resource utilization and DDMRP parameters, that helps to choose a capacity solution among others and Azzamouri, Baptiste, Pellerin and Dessevre (2022) analyze the impact of a periodic review of DDMRP stock buffers, while Cuartas and Aguilar (2023) develop a hybrid algorithm based on reinforcement learning to determine the optimal time and quantity to buy a product and Martin, Lauras and Baptiste ( 2023) propose an experimental design to compare different multi-parameter sizing policies.…”
Section: Publications About Ddmrpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second topic is the study and improvement of the method itself. For example, Martin, Lauras, Baptiste, Lamothe, Fouqu and Miclo (2019) develop a process control and a decision-making tool to adjust buffer parameters, Lee and Rim (2019) propose an alternative model for the safety stock calculation, while Achergui, Allaoui and Hsu (2020) develop an algorithm to solve the optimization problem of minimizing storing costs for uncapacitated buffer positioning and (Damand, Lahrichi & Barth, 2023) propose a multi-objective genetic algorithm to determine a set of parameters related to DDMRP. Recently, Dessevre et al (2021) propose a visual tool to correlate service rate, resource utilization and DDMRP parameters, that helps to choose a capacity solution among others and Azzamouri, Baptiste, Pellerin and Dessevre (2022) analyze the impact of a periodic review of DDMRP stock buffers, while Cuartas and Aguilar (2023) develop a hybrid algorithm based on reinforcement learning to determine the optimal time and quantity to buy a product and Martin, Lauras and Baptiste ( 2023) propose an experimental design to compare different multi-parameter sizing policies.…”
Section: Publications About Ddmrpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve the above management objectives optimization, multi-objective optimization is necessary. The MOP method mainly includes traditional optimization methods such as linear weighting and intelligent optimization algorithms such as multi-objective GA [18]. Among them, GA has higher global optimization capability, and this algorithm can solve MOP.…”
Section: Research On Engineering Project Mop Model Based On Nsga -ⅱ A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lahrichi et al [28] suggested the use of the MILP model in determining strategic reservoir parameters. In their publications [29,30], authors Damand et al presented a procedure for applying genetic algorithms to determine DDMRP system parameters. In their publication, Martin et al [31] compared several approaches to sizing DDMRP system parameters from different authors and verified the results using dynamic simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%