Parameters Extraction of Photovoltaic Cell Based on Experimental Current-Voltage Characteristic

Mokhliss, Hamza; Rais, Khalid

doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1405-6_82

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In other cases, they cited their experimental results on Si, CIGS, organic, and plastic solar cells [29,[181][182][183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190]. In another study, they cite them as an example that R s is small [180], while in another case they cite [21] mentioning that is not based on an electrical model, with no clear explanation for this [191].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Solar cell parameter accuracy improvement, via refinement of the Co-Content function. Part 1: theoretical analysis

Rangel-Kuoppa¹

2022

Eng. Res. Express

108

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this Part 1 of this series of articles, the accuracy on the obtention of the shunt resistance (Rsh ), the series resistance (Rs ), the ideality factor (n), the light current (Ilig ), and the saturation current (Isat ), via the use of the Co-content function CC(V, I)= ∫0 V(I-Isc)dV (where Isc =I(V=0) ) is investigated theoretically, as function of the number of measured points per voltage (PV ) and percentage noise (pn ). Reasonable values are obtained for Rsh , Rs , and Ilig , with PV = 11 measurement points per V if the pn is 0.1 % or less. For a reasonable determination of n at least PV = 101 measurement points per V are needed. Isat determination requires pn of 0.01 % or lower with at least PV = 101 measured points per V and should be evaluated at large values of V. The results given in this Part 1 are used in Part 2 to discuss the reported application of the CC(V,I) to obtain Rsh , Rs , n, Ilig , and Isat found in the literature.

show abstract