2021
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2020.3005105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Equivalent Magnetic Network Modeling Approach for Multiobjective Optimization of PM Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although recent studies have optimized electric machines such as linear machines [29] and permanent magnet motors [30][31][32][33] using only an RN alone, the results were verified via FE analysis. This means that a high-fidelity model is required even if the optimizations are conducted using only a lowfidelity RN.…”
Section: Sequential Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recent studies have optimized electric machines such as linear machines [29] and permanent magnet motors [30][31][32][33] using only an RN alone, the results were verified via FE analysis. This means that a high-fidelity model is required even if the optimizations are conducted using only a lowfidelity RN.…”
Section: Sequential Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity analysis can effectively identify the influence of each design parameter on the various optimization performances of the SPM machine [13,25]. Sensitivity analysis based on functional decomposition of variance is adopted in this paper to show the effect of each design variable on the optimization objectives [10].…”
Section: Comprehensive Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most of the previous multi-objective optimization strategies were mainly based on numerical techniques such as 2D and 3D finite element (FE) models, recent literature has proposed some alternatives based on parametric magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) models [13], which is a notable contribution of this analysis. FE techniques are the most accurate; however, owing to the heavy computational burden and the cumbersome operations, MEC-based models are highly preferred because of their low computational costs during the initial design stages [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to account for the nonlinear behavior of the magnetic circuit, the MEC has been iteratively-solved using the Newton-Raphson algorithm. In [12], Cao et al proposed a mesh MEC model aimed at a multi-objective optimization of a surface-mounted PM. A parametric method has been considered in the mesh generation so that the MEC structure can be updated according to the changes of the reluctance network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%