Parametric gasification process of sugarcane bagasse for syngas production

Raheem, Abdul; Zhao, Ming; Dastyar, Wafa; Channa, Abdul Qadir; Ji, Guozhao; Zhang, Ye Shui

doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.127

Cited by 41 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The rise in gaseous yield could be attributed to tar and char conversion in relation to growing heating carrier temperature. As a result, Due to the thermal cracking process and the boudouard reaction, higher tar and char can both be transformed into gases [18]. However, higher temperatures may encourage the disintegration of the C-C and C-O bands, resulting in smaller particles and a higher probability of them becoming reduced gas particles [19].…”

Section: Effect Of Temperature On Product Yield Of Co-gasificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Temperature and Blending Ratio on Product Yield for Co-gasification of Torrefied Palm Kernel Shell and Low-Density Polyethylene

Ibrahim,

Ahmad,

Ishak

2024

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the product yields produced from the co-gasification of torrefied palm kernel shell (TPKS) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE). Prior co-gasification, PKS was undergo pre-treatment process at different temperature. The optimum parameter for torrefaction was found at 250 °C for 60 min reaction time with 4.89 wt. % moisture content and 10.48 wt.% fixed carbon. Thus, the result indicated that TPKS a suitable fuel feedstock for futher thermal conversion. Then, TPKS and LDPE were gasified at temperature of 600, 800 and 1000 °C and blending ratio of 10:90, 50:50, 90:10 (TPKS:LDPE) for 60 min reaction time. Based on the findings found that, temperature plays an important role in co-gasification. Higher gasification temperature increases the carbon conversion which improves gasification rate. By varying temperature from 600 to 1000 °C, the gas yield increased whilst tar yield decreased sharply. For the effect of blending ratio, through blending of TPKS and LDPE, the gas and char yield increase, while tar decrease with increase torrefied TPKS ratio. Furthermore, it was observed that the product yields obtained from the co-gasification of TPKS and LDPE at 50:50 blending ratios produce the highest gas yield with low char and tar yield than another blending ratio. Therefore, based on the effect of temperature and blending ratio on product yield shows that the optimum parameter to produce maximum gas yield with minimum tar and char yield are at 50:50 (TPKS:LDPE) blending ratio at 800 °C for 60 minutes reaction time.

show abstract

Section: Effect Of Temperature On Product Yield Of Co-gasificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Temperature and Blending Ratio on Product Yield for Co-gasification of Torrefied Palm Kernel Shell and Low-Density Polyethylene

Ibrahim,

Ahmad,

Ishak

2024

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This multistage process includes drying, pyrolysis, oxidation, and reduction, resulting in a gas mixture consisting of carbon monoxide (CO), H 2 , CO 2 , methane (CH 4 ), and other gases. [12,14,16] The produced syngas has versatile applications, including as a fuel for heating boilers, [103] power generators, [30,104] feedstock for chemical processes, [105] liquid fuel production, [27,106] and H 2 generation. [16,28,102,107] Gasification can be performed with or without a catalyst, depending on the specific type of gasification process, as illustrated in Figure 6.…”

Section: Gasificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Steam reforming necessitates very dry or dehydrated biomass [156] due to the presence of steam, while HTL can accommodate wet or high-moisture content biomass , [129,157] and gasification is also capable of handling such biomass. [12,16,27,28,103,104,158] Fourth, in terms of energy efficiency, steam reforming excels in producing H 2 -rich syngas, while HTL and gasification are more efficient in generating liquid bio-oil and syngas, respectively. Fifth, catalysts play a significant role in steam reforming, [40,41,[151][152][153][154] as the process is practically nonexistent without their presence, especially for hydrocarbon conversion at temperatures exceeding 1300 K. Further investigation into non-catalytic partial oxidation of hydrocarbons within the range of 1400-1800 K is necessary.…”

Section: Steam Reformingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi‐Pathways for Sustainable Fuel Production from Biomass Using Zirconium‐Based Catalysts: A Comprehensive Review

Purnama,

Trisunaryanti,

Wijaya

et al. 2023

Energy Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Numerous concerns, including environmental impact and public health issues, drive the urgent need to replace nonrenewable fossil fuels with renewable energy sources, with biomass emerging as a viable alternative globally. In this comprehensive review, the urgent need to transition from nonrenewable fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is addressed, focusing on biomass as a global alternative. It examines the role of zirconium‐based catalysts in converting biomass into biofuels and hydrogen. Various biomass extraction methods based on the thermochemical processes (pyrolysis, gasification, hydrothermal liquefaction, hydrocracking, and steam reforming) are explored, including their merits and limitations. Additionally, the properties of zirconium‐based catalysts and their catalytic efficiency in biomass conversion are assessed, highlighting the factors influencing their performance. In this literature review, the promising potential of zirconium‐based catalysts in enhancing the sustainability and efficiency of global biofuel production from biomass is revealed. It underscores the critical role of biomass as a renewable energy source and highlights the significance of zirconium‐based catalysts in advancing sustainable biofuel production. It offers insights into addressing environmental concerns, promoting public health, and supporting the global transition toward renewable energy solutions.

show abstract

“…Biomass is a group of organic materials that can be transformed into energy, and it is considered as a potential renewable energy source, and it accounts for over 70 % of renewable energy production and 10 % of world energy supply (Bioenergy, 2020). There are several conversion methods for transforming biomass into energy (Raheem et al, 2019). Those conversion methods are fermentation, combustion, anaerobic digestion, supercritical water gasification, and pyrolysis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kinetic Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Gasification in Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier Using Response Surface Method

Tulu

Atnaw

Bededa

et al. 2022

Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the kinetic modeling of biomass gasification in bubbling fluidized bed (BFB) gasifiers and optimization methods to maximize gasification products. The kinetic model was developed based on two-phase fluidization theory. In this work, reaction kinetics, hydrodynamic conditions, convective and diffusion effect, and the thermal cracking of tar kinetics were considered in the model. The model was coded in MATLAB and simulated. The result depicted good agreement with experimental work in literature. The sensitivity analysis was carried out and the effect of temperature ranging from 650 to 850 and steam to biomass ratio (S/B) ranging from 0.1 to 2 was investigated. The result showed that an increase in temperature promoted H2 production from 18.73 % to 36.87 %, reduced that of CO from 39.97 % to 34.2 %, and CH4 from 18.01 % to 11.65 %. Furthermore, surface response was constructed from the regression model and the mutual effect of temperature and S/B on gasification products and heating value was investigated. In addition, the desirability function was employed to optimize gasification product and heating value. The maximum gasification product yield was obtained at 827.9 and 0.1 S/B. The response predicted by desirability function at these optimum operational conditions was 30.1 %, 44.1 %, 13.2 %, 12.9 %, 14.035 MJ/Nm3, and 14.5 MJ/Nm3 for H2, CO, CO2, CH4, LHV, and HHV, respectively. Kinetic modeling of the biomass gasification in BFB process is still under development, which considers the diffusion effect, tar cracking, reaction kinetics, and hydrodynamic behavior. Moreover, the large number of previous studies gave priority to a single parameter investigation. However, this investigation can be extended to various parameters analysis simultaneously, which would give solid information on system performance analysis.

show abstract

Parametric gasification process of sugarcane bagasse for syngas production

Cited by 41 publications

References 63 publications

Influence of Temperature and Blending Ratio on Product Yield for Co-gasification of Torrefied Palm Kernel Shell and Low-Density Polyethylene

Influence of Temperature and Blending Ratio on Product Yield for Co-gasification of Torrefied Palm Kernel Shell and Low-Density Polyethylene

Multi‐Pathways for Sustainable Fuel Production from Biomass Using Zirconium‐Based Catalysts: A Comprehensive Review

Kinetic Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Gasification in Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier Using Response Surface Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About