1993
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690391010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric sensitivity study of a CFD‐based coal combustion model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the results of Smith et al (1993), the position of #ame front is largely in#uenced by the initial turbulent intensity. This is due to the characteristics of the pulverized #ame with low gas temperature and long lifto!…”
Section: Ewect Of Initial Turbulent Intensitycontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike the results of Smith et al (1993), the position of #ame front is largely in#uenced by the initial turbulent intensity. This is due to the characteristics of the pulverized #ame with low gas temperature and long lifto!…”
Section: Ewect Of Initial Turbulent Intensitycontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In addition, he observed that radiation has most e!ect on the CO concentration with the decrease. Smith et al (1993), however, con"rmed that the e!ect of radiation on the #ow is smaller than that of devolatilization and particle dispersion. Figure 3 represents the gas temperature distributions at the axis (r/R"0.0) and the wall (r/R"1.0) with and without radiation heat transfer.…”
Section: Ewect Of Radiation Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in this study, the Q factor is assigned as a value for all the coal types in order to ascertain the availability of computations. Lockwood and Salooja (1983), Lackwood and Mahmud (1988) and Smith et al (1993) examined the importance of volatile release in computation. They insisted that the temperature of reaction zone and coal conversion be predicted to be lower than the experimental data, provided Q"1.0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%