1999
DOI: 10.1049/ip-map:19990339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric study of the coupling aperture in CPW–fed microstrip antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the coupling slot length increases, the resonant frequency decreases as reported in [7]. Therefore, altering the length of the coupling slot will shift the resonant frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…As the coupling slot length increases, the resonant frequency decreases as reported in [7]. Therefore, altering the length of the coupling slot will shift the resonant frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The length of the slot affects the resonance frequency but has only a small effect on the return loss. As the slot length increases, the resonant frequency decreases as reported in [17,18]. Therefore, altering the length of the coupling slot will shift the resonant frequency.…”
Section: Capacitively Coupled Patchmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Now the MEI measuring functions are equal to Haar wavelet coefficients, and the Haar coefficients can be computed efficiently with the use of the pyramid scheme as shown in [7]. …”
Section: Wavelet Mei Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the current I a flowing along the arms of the coupling slot is neglected, the antenna can roughly be modeled by the schematic depicted in Figure 6, where I is the feeding current. The assumption I a Ϸ0 is reasonable because the field is mainly concentrated in the CPW end [7] for small values of R d and also because the arms of the coupling slot are long enough to avoid a diode shorting. It is clear from Figure 6 that the ratio P d /(P loss ϩ P rad ) is proportional to R d .…”
Section: Gain Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%