Parametric study of the impact of building envelope systems on embodied and operational carbon of residential buildings

Abstract

PurposeBuildings are responsible for the consumption of around 40% of energy in the world and account for one-third of greenhouses gas emissions. In Saudi Arabia, residential buildings consume half of total energy among other building sectors. This study aims to explore the impact of sixteen envelope variables on the operational and embodied carbon of a typical Saudi house with over 20 years of operation.Design/methodology/approachA simulation approach has been adopted to examine the effects of envelope variables including external wall type, roof type, glazing type, window to wall ratio (WWR) and shading device. To model the building and define the envelope materials and quantify the annual energy consumption, DesignBuilder software was used. Following modelling, operational carbon was calculated. A “cradle-to-gate” approach was adopted to assess embodied carbon during the production of materials for the envelope variables based on the Inventory of Carbon Energy database.FindingsThe results showed that operational carbon represented 90% of total life cycle carbon, whilst embodied carbon accounted for 10%. The sensitivity analysis revealed that 25% WWR contributes to a significant increase in operational carbon by 47.4%. Additionally, the efficient block wall with marble has a major embodiment of carbon greater than the base case by 10.7%.Research limitations/implicationsThis study is a contribution to the field of calculating the embodied and operational carbon emissions of a residential unit. Besides, it provides an examination of the impact of each envelope variable on both embodied and operational carbon. This study is limited by the impact of sixteen envelope variables on the embodied as well as operational carbon.Originality/valueThis study is the first attempt on investigating the effects of envelop variables on carbon footprint for residential buildings in Saudi Arabia.

Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach for building decarbonization by design choices: A case study

“…Although the GWP is important, it is not included in the building energy directives of Turkey or other countries. 37 Although the annual greenhouse gas amount per usage area produced from the final energy consumption is specified in the energy performance certificates, the GWP is omitted. This approach has its drawbacks.…”

Integrating TAM and IS success model: exploring the role of blockchain and AI in predicting learner engagement and performance in e-learning

“…The results show that openness and reputation are crucial factors affecting users' behavioral use, which in turn, affect their learning performance. Furthermore, Liaw (2008), Li et al (2014), and (Hamida et al, 2022) emphasize the importance of understanding students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral use, and the effectiveness of elearning systems. Liaw (2008) investigates students' satisfaction and behavioral use in the context of the Blackboard system, finding that perceived satisfaction is a significant predictor of behavioral use, which in turn affects learning performance.…”

Integrated LCA-LCC assessment model of offsite, onsite, and conventional construction systems

“…A parametric study for building an envelope system's impact on operational and embodied carbon of residential building is also introduced by Hamida et al The results of this study indicate that operational carbon represents about 90% of the overall life cycle carbon, whilst embodied carbon accounted for 10%. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the window to wall ratio significantly contributes to an increase in operational carbon by 47.4% [22]. According to a study by Schlueter and Thesseling, requiring building designers to prioritize eco-friendly parameters resulted in more robust design ideas that both fulfil the needs of clients and results in sustainable architecture [23].…”