2017
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20170304.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Study on the Axial Behaviour of Concrete Filled Steel Tube (CFST) Columns

Abstract: Abstract:Concrete filled steel tube (CFST) columns are widely used in civil engineering structures due to its abundant structural benefits like excellent seismic behaviour, ultimate load bearing capacity, fire resistivity, excellent ductility and energy absorption capacity, particularly in zones of high seismic risk. Due to their excellent engineering properties, CFST columns are used in buildings, bridges, electric transmission line and offshore structures. The ultimate load carrying capacity of CFST columns … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The material properties, cross-section, slenderness, and some other specifications of the reference curvatures may differ from the main references of this study (Cc2 and Ss2), but their performance shows that the FEA results are in line with the studies of Yang and Han and their team [25,31,32,48] in this regard. As it is evident from Figures 4 and 5, in the numerical analysis, the curves hit the maximum peak and buckled afterwards and experienced failure which these phenomena are in accordance with the results of other studies with similar conditions [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. In the experimental analysis [49], the load-bearing capacity of the CCFST column was reached to 1489 kN, while in the FE analysis, it reached 1487 kN.…”
Section: Fea For the Verification Purposesupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The material properties, cross-section, slenderness, and some other specifications of the reference curvatures may differ from the main references of this study (Cc2 and Ss2), but their performance shows that the FEA results are in line with the studies of Yang and Han and their team [25,31,32,48] in this regard. As it is evident from Figures 4 and 5, in the numerical analysis, the curves hit the maximum peak and buckled afterwards and experienced failure which these phenomena are in accordance with the results of other studies with similar conditions [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. In the experimental analysis [49], the load-bearing capacity of the CCFST column was reached to 1489 kN, while in the FE analysis, it reached 1487 kN.…”
Section: Fea For the Verification Purposesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This is normally when the ultimate strain of steel, ε su , is equal to 0.1. The stress-strain curves achieved from the previous CFST experimental analysis were considered for validation purpose of the models in this study [47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Nonlinear Configuration For Feamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the compressive strength of concrete will divert the failure control mode to the yield strength of the steel tube and vice versa. The strength of the concrete inside the CFST is responsible for the stiffness of the CFST columns [ 100 ]. Stiffness rises along with concrete compressive strength, yet columns fracture owing to concrete crushing and brittle behavior when filled with high strength concrete.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%