1990
DOI: 10.1002/mus.880130106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paramyotonia congenita or hyperkalemic periodic paralysis? Clinical and electrophysiological features of each entity in one family

Abstract: The nosological distinction between paramyotonia congenita (PC) and hyperkalemic periodic paralysis (HPP) continues to generate debate. Recently, electrophysiological signs thought to be specific for each entity have been described and have been used to bolster the argument that the two disorders are distinct. We report a particularly instructive family wherein individual members had clinical features of either PC or HPP and electrophysiological features of both. We suggest that PC and HPP represent part of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, a family was reported in which individual members had clinical features of either hyperkalaemic periodic paralysis or paramyotonia congenita despite common electrophysiological features 9. An Ala1156Thr mutation was reported to be responsible for the development of hyperkalaemic periodic paralysis and paramyotonia congenita in one family 9…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, a family was reported in which individual members had clinical features of either hyperkalaemic periodic paralysis or paramyotonia congenita despite common electrophysiological features 9. An Ala1156Thr mutation was reported to be responsible for the development of hyperkalaemic periodic paralysis and paramyotonia congenita in one family 9…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in sensitivity could be explained by an incorrect diagnosis of periodic paralysis, by the influence of treatment, by the fluctuating nature of the disease with periodic improvements in muscle excitability, or by variations in the application of the method. Although exercise testing has been reported in several studies, [5][6][7][8][9] the factors affecting the responses were not specifically evaluated. The sensitivity of exercise tests for detecting asymptomatic carriers is also unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of more families from different ethnic backgrounds might help to establish a correlation between genotype and phenotype, Once the precise alteration in the channel is identified, patch-clamp studies might improve our understanding of how this affects channel gating in both normal and diseased muscle, and available drugs such as mexiletine, potassium-sparing agents, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, etc. might then be more specifically used [14,30] according to the channel involved and the degree of channel gating involvement [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most PC patients demonstrate some degree of myotonic worsening with K + loading. However, in some cases the attacks of weakness are associated with normo-or hypokalemia [21], even though there are patients with the features of both HYPP and PC [24,27]. Electrophysiological investigations of HYPP and PC muscle in vitro have revealed an alteration in muscle membrane sodium conductance [26,15], suggesting that sodium channels are involved in the pathogenesis of periodic paralysis [ 16,12].…”
Section: Received 15 March 1994 -Accepted 11 July 1994mentioning
confidence: 99%