2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2006.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parathyroidectomy monitored by intra-operative PTH: The relevance of the 20 min end-point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, operations were performed under local or general anesthesia, through a 2 to 4-cm transverse neck incision, with or without the use of video assistance. Intraoperative PTH levels were determined as described elsewhere, and a decrease of circulating PTH level by 50%, 20 minutes after excision of the enlarged parathyroid gland(s) was considered indicative of successful parathyroidectomy [14]. Most patients were discharged home the next day of surgery.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, operations were performed under local or general anesthesia, through a 2 to 4-cm transverse neck incision, with or without the use of video assistance. Intraoperative PTH levels were determined as described elsewhere, and a decrease of circulating PTH level by 50%, 20 minutes after excision of the enlarged parathyroid gland(s) was considered indicative of successful parathyroidectomy [14]. Most patients were discharged home the next day of surgery.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the CV of duplicates exceeded 10%, the sample was reanalyzed. In our previous study, the RI-PTH assay was evaluated by comparing RI-PTH results with the Roche assay for routine intact PTH, using the automatic analyzer MODULAR E170® (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) [24]. The two assays yielded similar results (r=0.94; n=85), but the RI-PTH assay showed a proportional negative bias relatively to the Roche assay, presumably due to different cross-reactions in the detection of (1-84) PTH as well as non-(1-84) fragments as by different analytical procedures [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study, the RI-PTH assay was evaluated by comparing RI-PTH results with the Roche assay for routine intact PTH, using the automatic analyzer MODULAR E170® (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) [24]. The two assays yielded similar results (r=0.94; n=85), but the RI-PTH assay showed a proportional negative bias relatively to the Roche assay, presumably due to different cross-reactions in the detection of (1-84) PTH as well as non-(1-84) fragments as by different analytical procedures [24]. Basing on the results of the previously published paper, an appropriate correcting factor (0.67) was applied to convert RI-PTH to routine Roche PTH values (normal range 10-65 ng/L), so as to standardize interpretation criteria [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, blood collection timing appears to be a critical step (17). The widely used Miami criterion (rapid IOPTH value drop >50% from the highest levels either pre-incision or at 10 min after gland excision) is reported to have a high overall accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%