Background-Aim: Mammographically dense breast tissue is related to a higher risk of breast cancer. We aim to evaluate a computerized system, assess whether it can provide an accurate and objective estimation of the breast density and if it can accurately classify the mammograms according to the ACR/ BIRADS system. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the mediolateral oblique (MLO) and cranial-caudal (CC) views of 83 normal mammograms and classified them, both manually and with the use of computerized texture analysis (CTA), according to their density. We grouped the mammograms either into two (ACR 1-2, ACR 3-4) or four categories (ACR 1 to 4). An inter-rater reliability analysis was performed using the kappa statistic to determine consistency among the radiologist and the CTA. Results: The best matching was observed for the MLO view when the classification involved 2 groups (94%).