1989
DOI: 10.1038/338249a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental care and mating behaviour of polyandrous dunnocks Prunella modularis related to paternity by DNA fingerprinting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
257
1
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 490 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
11
257
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, males (but not females) produced by older mothers were actually less successful, contrary to the predicted relationship (electronic supplementary material, table S4). Although we have no direct data on provisioning of individual offspring in the junco, evidence from other avian species does not support the idea that parents can differentially allocate care within a brood based on offspring paternity [47][48][49][50][51]. However, while we have accounted for some potential sources of maternal or environmental variation, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that females that produce EPO also vary in some way that affects offspring quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In fact, males (but not females) produced by older mothers were actually less successful, contrary to the predicted relationship (electronic supplementary material, table S4). Although we have no direct data on provisioning of individual offspring in the junco, evidence from other avian species does not support the idea that parents can differentially allocate care within a brood based on offspring paternity [47][48][49][50][51]. However, while we have accounted for some potential sources of maternal or environmental variation, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that females that produce EPO also vary in some way that affects offspring quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To test the predictions resulting from their model, we therefore defined cooperative breeding as a breeding system in which at least 10% of young are retained on their natal territory and provide care to siblings. Consequently, polyandrous species (such as the dunnock and Galapagos hawk) or plural breeding systems without natal philopatry (such as that of the greater ani, where direct fitness benefits are thought to play a key role in maintaining cooperative behaviour [23][24][25]) are excluded from our definition of cooperation.…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, many studies have either ignored the problem of potentially misassigning parentage within cooperatively breeding groups completely, or simply stated that incest does not occur because it has never been observed directly (Lundy et al 1998). Yet, genetic techniques have previously revealed unexpected levels of reproductive success among individuals, and have provided evidence of breeding by individuals assumed to be non-breeders (Burke et al 1989;Gibbs et al 1990;Dixon et al 1994;Allen et al 1995). Incest has been observed directly in a number of avian populations (see above), and been confirmed genetically in one of these populations by multilocus DNA fingerprinting analysis where eggs were marked as they were laid and the mother's identity could be deduced from distinctive egg shell patterns (McRae 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%