2018
DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental Education and Family Dissolution: A Cross‐National and Cohort Comparison

Abstract: This is the first study to systematically analyze whether the association between parental education and family dissolution varies cross‐nationally and over time. The authors use meta‐analytic tools to study cross‐national variation between 17 countries with data from the Generations and Gender Study and Harmonized Histories. The association shows considerable cross‐national variation, but is positive in most countries. The association between parental education and family dissolution has become less positive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in this study, meta-analytical tools were used to first analyze whether there is cross-national variation and if so, whether this cross-national variation can be explained by a country-level indicator. Brons and Härkönen (2018), first of all, show that already with regard to the prevalence of union dissolution, large country differences are found. The percentage of people that dissolved their childbearing union was highest in Estonia (29.8%) and Russia (28.9%), while in Georgia, Italy and Bulgaria, this percentage was below 10% (see Brons and Härkönen 2018 for percentages for all the countries).…”
Section: Family (Dis)advantage and Union Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, in this study, meta-analytical tools were used to first analyze whether there is cross-national variation and if so, whether this cross-national variation can be explained by a country-level indicator. Brons and Härkönen (2018), first of all, show that already with regard to the prevalence of union dissolution, large country differences are found. The percentage of people that dissolved their childbearing union was highest in Estonia (29.8%) and Russia (28.9%), while in Georgia, Italy and Bulgaria, this percentage was below 10% (see Brons and Härkönen 2018 for percentages for all the countries).…”
Section: Family (Dis)advantage and Union Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, only a few studies analyzed the link between parental SES and the risk to dissolve a union and these studies were all conducted in single countries. Therefore, Brons and Härkönen (2018) focused on the link between parental SES and union dissolution, or more specifically, the risk to dissolve a childbearing union in 17 different European countries using data from the first wave of the GGP. Parental SES was measured by parental education.…”
Section: Family (Dis)advantage and Union Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6.2 encounter difficulties in explicitly modeling country-level effects and cross-level interactions, our method is capable to comprehensively do so. Additional examples of this approach can be found in other publications within the Context of Opportunities (CONOPP) project (see Brons and Harkonen 2018;Brons et al 2017;Koops 2020;Zoutewelle-Terovan and Liefbroer 2018). Third, whereas our discussion and examples focus on modeling one random slope, multiple random slopes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors are not only related to the intergenerational transmission of home ownership but also play a role in explaining separation (be it sometimes positively instead of negatively (the remaining effect of home ownership on breaking up that has been found in this paper is negative). More economic parental resources (that go together with more home ownership) are assumed to be related to break-up, either positively (parents can help in costly divorce) or negatively (parents financial support reduces financial stress of the couple) (Brons and Härkönen 2018); living close to parents [which increases the likelihood of intergenerational transmission of home ownership, e.g. due to housing market similarities (Mulder et al 2015)] can imply a tighter social network with more social pressure to stay together (Högnäs and Carlson 2010); and higher parental SES couples are found to be more likely to break up, at least in the Netherlands (De Graaf and Kalmijn 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%