2001
DOI: 10.1080/00220670109596579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental Involvement, Instructional Expenditures, Family Socioeconomic Attributes, and Student Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
72
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant negative correlations occur between all of the achievement test scores and the percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunches (p < 0.01). This indicates that classrooms containing a larger percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunches also had students with lower achievement scores, in line with previous findings (Okpala et al, 2001). Because a significant relationship occurs between achievement scores and free or reduced-price lunches, this demographic variable was used as a control variable for some of the statistical analyses.…”
Section: Data Analyses and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Significant negative correlations occur between all of the achievement test scores and the percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunches (p < 0.01). This indicates that classrooms containing a larger percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunches also had students with lower achievement scores, in line with previous findings (Okpala et al, 2001). Because a significant relationship occurs between achievement scores and free or reduced-price lunches, this demographic variable was used as a control variable for some of the statistical analyses.…”
Section: Data Analyses and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This is even more evident when we compare students from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds using the Duncan index, which ranged from .50 to .60 in 2008 (Valenzuela, Bellei & De los Ríos, 2013). In particular, students from low social background show lower scores on curricular or disciplinary aspects and also for generic math skills associated with their performance (Cerda, Pérez & Melipillán, 2010a, 2010bCerda, Ortega, Pérez, Flores & Melipillán, 2011;Okpala & Okpala, 2001;Ramirez, 2006;Woolley et al, 2008). Perhaps parents of higher social background have and express higher expectations about their children's academic activities, which results in an improvement of their the academic performance, providing more and more varied activities with numbers or simply allowing their children to interact with more resources or materials that support math learning (Byrnes & Wasik, 2009;Ee, Wong & Aunio, 2006;Jordan et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research has found positive relationships between expenditures and student outcomes (Summers & Wolfe, 1977;Greenwald, Hedges, & Laine, 1996;Jacques & Brorsen, 2002;Ram, 2004;Li & Tobias, 2005;Hogrebe, KyeiBlankson, & Zou, 2008), though Ilon and Normore (2006) concluded that per-pupil expenditures were the least cost-effective means of resource input for student achievement. While some research (Hanushek, 1986;Hanushek, 1989;Okpala, Okpala, & Smith, 2001) concluded that there was no relationship between expenditures and achievement, Ismail and Cheng (2005) have argued that the results from Hanushek (1986Hanushek ( , 1989 were based on poor data and inappropriate methodology. Archibald (2006) found positive effects of per-pupil expenditures on reading achievement throughout primary and secondary education, while Eide and Showalter (1998) used quantile regression to show that per-pupil expenditures are important for the tail end of the performance distribution, in other words, students at the lowest end of test score distributions benefit significantly from greater expenditures.…”
Section: Pupil-teacher Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%