2008
DOI: 10.1163/157181108x374752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parental Religious Rights vs. Compulsory Religious Education in Turkey

Abstract: Despite parents having primary responsibility, it remains the State's duty to ensure its citizens' education. The orientation of the State's education can be secular can religious; however, the State – having the discretion on curriculum – should comply with human rights principles by promoting pluralism and refraining from indoctrination. In this respect, discussions around religious education have been, and are, highly controversial. This has especially been the case for countries such as Turkey, which have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, it should not only deal with various orientations within the same religion but also address different religions and their worldviews and ethical understandings [28] (pp. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Religious Education Between 1980 and 2012mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, it should not only deal with various orientations within the same religion but also address different religions and their worldviews and ethical understandings [28] (pp. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Religious Education Between 1980 and 2012mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The curriculum addresses both multiculturalism and national issues [27]. The existing curriculum expresses the secular nature of the state and the inclination of the curriculum's authors [35].…”
Section: Religious Education Between 1980 and 2012mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the Human Rights Council, parents and guardians have the right to ensure that the child gains moral and religious education in conformity with their convictions. However, it should also be noted that the parents' right should also be balanced with the states' duty to provide comprehensive education to the child (Akbulut & Usal 2009;Lester 2004).…”
Section: Finnish Model Of Wementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argued that the forcible teaching of a religion-based course was against the official definition of secularism, that is, the separation of state and religion. 46 For instance, on January 2, 2004, Hasan Zengin and his daughter Eylem Zengin made an application to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against the Republic of Turkey. They claimed that the compulsory course infringed their rights as guaranteed by the Article 2 of Protocol 1 and Article 9 of the Convention.…”
Section: The Changing Content Of Compulsory "Religious Culture and Etmentioning
confidence: 99%