This article reviews recent government efforts to address the "Alevi issue" and identify their successes and failures. It demonstrates that the "Alevi openings" constituted paradoxical processes: tracing various components of the "openings" through news media, it shows that, on one hand, they enabled the "Alevi issue" to be brought to public attention. On the other hand, once Alevis were made more visible in public, non-sympathizers could mobilize their representation for their own ends. These empirical findings have profound theoretical implications. They show that "discursive claims of democratization" at the state level do not necessarily result in democratic mechanisms, which can resolve the demands of a pluralistic civil society. The author argues that what she calls the "tutelary secularism" in Turkey, in other words, the management and disciplining of religious groups, continues under the Justice and Development Party (AKP) rule. This model not only fails, but also produces new sources of conflict in Turkey.The growing literature on Alevis in Turkey generally starts with a statement about who the Alevis are, how many Alevis currently reside in the country, which cities they live in and which languages they speak. These rather hackneyed introductions stem from the fact that discussions about Alevis in Turkey have been visible in the public sphere only in the last few decades, 1 a time that is commonly known and referred as the "Alevi revival" 2 or the "Alevi renaissance". 3 Throughout the history of the Turkish Republic, the founding People's Republican Party (Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi, CHP) has not played an active role toward the Alevis, a group that has constituted a large segment of its electorate, in the name of "separating religion from politics". 4 Furthermore, the newly established state executed excessive measures (referred to in the literature as a massacre or genocide) in the Dersim region in 1937 -38. 5 Alevis' faith-related demands (from hereon, referred to as the "Alevi issue") were brought into public discussion for the first time, ironically, by the conservative Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP).