Pareto Assessment of Quality Control in Poultry Processing Plants

Cravener, T. L.; Roush, W. B.; Jordan, Harry E.

doi:10.1093/japr/2.3.297

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Pareto principle is often termed the "80/20 rule", because 80 per cent of defects in a system result from only 20 per cent of the possible causes. Juran suggested that quality control processes such as Pareto analysis can help separate the "vital few" from the "trivial many" (Cravener et al, 1993) and this principle is a "universal" for planning and controlling. The Pareto 80/20 principle has been mostly used as a rule of thumb, not based on a theoretical derivation, but approved in practical trying.…”

Section: Pareto Analysis Of Factors That Affect the Implementation Of Haccpmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, Pareto histograms are commonly used to determine maintenance priorities by ranking equipment failure codes according to their relative cost or downtime contribution (Knights, 2001). Years ago, Cravener et al (1993) used Pareto analysis as a tool to help identify and prioritise defects that are associated with poultry products and need consideration. Recently, Karuppusami and Gandhinathan (2006) identified and proposed a list of a "few vital" critical success factors (CSFs) that affect the implementation of total quality management (TQM).…”

Section: Bfj 1135mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Critical factors for effective implementation of the HACCP system: a Pareto analysis

Fotopoulos

Kafetzopoulos

Gotzamani

2011

British Food Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe main objective of this paper is to examine the existing literature on food safety assurance systems and record the vital critical factors that affect the implementation of these systems, in the context of the global food‐processing sector, for the benefit of researchers and industries.Design/methodology/approachA range of published (1995‐2008) articles on food safety is explored that lists the motives for and the barriers to the implementation of the Hazard Analysis of Critical Control Point plan in descending order of frequency of occurrences. The barriers and motives in this study are referred to as “critical factors of effective implementation” (CFEIs). In addition, the Pareto analysis quality tool was used to sort and arrange the above‐mentioned barriers to and motives for CFEIs of the HACCP system implementation according to their order of criticality.FindingsThe examination and analysis of 31 studies resulted in the identification of 32 factors that affect HACCP implementation. Difficulties exist in managing such a large number of factors in organisations; hence a few vital CFEIs are identified and reported herein, such as the most significant for the HACCP implementation.Practical implicationsThe present study will direct researchers in selecting a more reliable and critical set of CFEIs that will be used in further empirical studies and may help to develop models which measure and sustain the level of performance on safety systems in industries. Industries can also benefit by adopting the results of this study, resulting in a more effective implementation of food safety and quality systems.Originality/valueThis paper highlights and prioritises the difficulties hitherto faced by food companies in the effective implementation of food safety systems. The results of this study will help in a smoother and more effective penetration of food safety and quality systems in food organisations.

show abstract

Section: Pareto Analysis Of Factors That Affect the Implementation Of Haccpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Bfj 1135mentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical factors for effective implementation of the HACCP system: a Pareto analysis

Fotopoulos

Kafetzopoulos

Gotzamani

2011

British Food Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The affecting factors were arranged in the decreasing order of their significance. In this way, the most affecting factors can be evaluated efficiently [44].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Synthesis of polyaniline nanoparticles and their application for the removal of Crystal Violet dye by ultrasonicated adsorption process based on Response Surface Methodology

Saad

Tahir

Khan

et al. 2017

Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study focuses the synthesis of polyaniline nanoparticles (PANP) by rapid mixing polymerization method. They were recognized by FTIR and SEM techniques. Moreover they were utilized for the removal of Crystal Violet (CV) dye by ultrasonicated adsorption process. It ensures a quick alternative method compared to other conventional processes, which led to enhancement of mass transfer by ultrasound waves. The effectiveness of the process was confirmed through the effect of certain conditions like sonication time, temperature, adsorbent dosage and CV concentrations. The validity of the process was estimated by various adsorption isotherms. Kinetics and thermodynamic studies was also conducted to authenticate the process. The optimum operating parameters (OOP) were evaluated by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) based on central composite design (CCD) for the removal of CV dye. Moreover analysis of variances (ANOVA) was employed to estimate the significance of experimental variables. The predicated removal efficiency was found to be 94.29% which prove to be effectiveness of the process.

show abstract

“…If these constructs are accomplished properly, it helps ensure the success of innovation, increase business outcomes, and strengthen competitive advantages. To identify CIMPs, we use Pareto analysis to select the tasks or aspects that can generate a major impact [98]. This statistical technique aids in distinguishing the "vital few" and the "trivial many," a valuable insight when choices are made by management with regards to prioritization of issues.…”

Section: A Determining Cimps and Sub-cimpsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating Innovation Capability in Banking Under Uncertainty

Ngo

Tansuchat

et al. 2024

IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The evaluation of innovation capability (IC) plays a key role in an age of keen competition driven by modern technologies, since it enables organizations to review their innovation management process and to adjust their corresponding innovation policies. Moreover, the IC evaluation is, in fact, a multicriteria process with high uncertainty, since the market environments and competitors' performance are both in a dynamic environment. Therefore, the evaluation of IC under uncertainty is vital to organizations. This study proposes a new integrated method for the evaluation of IC in banking organizations by combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the evidential reasoning (ER) approach in terms of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Three Vietnamese banks were used as a case study to demonstrate the applicability and validity of the proposed method. Experts in banking-related fields were invited to determine the relative importance weights of critical innovation management practices (CIMPs) and their sub-CIMPs using the AHP and to score the maturity levels of sub-CIMPs at the evaluated banks. The ER approach was then applied to generate aggregated assessments representing the ICs of banks that were finally used for their ranking in terms of IC.

show abstract

Pareto Assessment of Quality Control in Poultry Processing Plants

Cited by 10 publications

References 3 publications

Critical factors for effective implementation of the HACCP system: a Pareto analysis

Critical factors for effective implementation of the HACCP system: a Pareto analysis

Synthesis of polyaniline nanoparticles and their application for the removal of Crystal Violet dye by ultrasonicated adsorption process based on Response Surface Methodology

Evaluating Innovation Capability in Banking Under Uncertainty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About